Corporate News
The new Garden City Mall on Thika Superhighway in Nairobi on May 28. PHOTO | FILE
By BRIAN WASUNA, bwasuna@ke.nationmedia.com
In Summary
- Garden City has accused Equity Bank of colluding with Sinohydro to block payment of a Sh606 million performance bond.
- The performance bond was to be cashed by the mall owners in the event they were not satisfied with Sinohydro’s work.
- Garden City has slapped the Chinese contractor with a Sh1.2 billion counterclaim it says arose from clauses of the construction deal which provided for penalties in the event Sinohydro failed to complete the mega project in the agreed one-year period.
Equity Bank
has blamed its failure to pay the owners of Garden City Mall a $5.496
million (Sh606 million) performance bond on a court order obtained by
contractor of the shopping complex, Sinohydro.
The lender says Sinohydro obtained the court order barring
it from disbursing the funds before queries that it had raised regarding
the mall’s demand for the amount had been answered.
Garden City has accused Equity Bank of colluding with Sinohydro to block payment of the performance bond.
The performance bond was to be cashed by the mall owners in the event they were not satisfied with Sinohydro’s work.
Garden City has raised issue with changes in some
materials that were to be used in the construction, and with the delayed
completion of the mall.
Equity Bank holds that Garden City’s demand was
sent through the letterhead of a Mauritian company called CIM Corporate
Service and not that of Garden City Retail.
CIM is one of Garden City Retail’s sister
companies. Equity Bank adds that Sinohydro obtained the court order
before clarifying the letterhead mix-up.
Sinohydro has sued Garden City Retail and Equity
Bank stopping them from cashing the performance bond until the dispute
over delays in completion have been determined by an arbiter.
“Equity Bank was duty bound to authenticate the
demand and establish why the same came from a different company from
Garden City Retail before paying out the sums. Equity Bank promptly
wrote back to Garden City Retail and as such cannot be blamed for not
paying out the monies immediately,” the bank says.
Garden City has slapped the Chinese contractor with
a Sh1.2 billion counterclaim it says arose from clauses of the
construction deal which provided for penalties in the event Sinohydro
failed to complete the mega project in the agreed one-year period.
Garden City and Sinohydro have agreed to appear
before an arbitrator but are at a stalemate over the performance bond,
which was to be issued irrespective of a dispute between the two
parties.
Sinohydro was to initially complete construction in
October last year, but sought an extension to January before asking for
a May 2015 deadline.
Garden City Retail’s refusal to grant the Chinese
firm another extension in January has seen Sinohydro rack up the Sh1.2
billion penalty going by the clauses in the contract that are calculated
on a daily basis.
Sinohydro is yet to complete the works and Garden
City says it has been forced to contract another firm to take over the
project.
No comments :
Post a Comment