GRAPHIC: MIKE MOSOTA
A farmer in Kenya is likely to receive only a fifth of the sale price at auction if he sells his coffee through a cooperative, Nation Newsplex has found.
The
lowered earnings have seen farmers turn away from coffee, in turn
leading to reduced production in Kenya as other countries increase
production.
Over nearly three decades, coffee’s share
of Kenya’s exports has plunged five-fold. In the 1987/1988 season,
Kenya’s highest ever total production was achieved, at 128,700 tonnes
placing Kenya in the 12th place worldwide. By 2013 the country had
slipped to the 24th position, producing only 39,800 tonnes.
As
production in Kenya has stagnated, a number of countries that produced
less coffee than Kenya in 1988 now produce more. The biggest strides
have been made by Vietnam, which is now the world’s second largest
producer, India, Honduras, Peru and China.
Even countries that do not grow coffee, such as Germany, which is the largest buyer of Kenya's coffee, and Switzerland have built a thriving industry on importing and re-exporting coffee.
Even countries that do not grow coffee, such as Germany, which is the largest buyer of Kenya's coffee, and Switzerland have built a thriving industry on importing and re-exporting coffee.
Figures from the International
Coffee Organisation (ICO) show that from 1990 to 2011, the value of
Germany’s re-exports increased five-fold, from Sh61.2 billion ($600
million) to just over Sh362.2 billion ($3.6 billion).
While some coffee is passed through Germany’s transport system
to reach other countries, the country also roasts coffee and creates
specialised products such as instant and decaffeinated coffee.
Germany accounted for 22 per cent of Kenya’s exports in 2014. It was followed by Belgium (16 per cent), the United States (14 per cent), Sweden (10 per cent), Finland (seven per cent), South Korea (four per cent) and France, the United Kingdom, Sudan and Canada (all two per cent).
Germany accounted for 22 per cent of Kenya’s exports in 2014. It was followed by Belgium (16 per cent), the United States (14 per cent), Sweden (10 per cent), Finland (seven per cent), South Korea (four per cent) and France, the United Kingdom, Sudan and Canada (all two per cent).
A
cup of coffee sold in a coffee shop in those countries will make the
farmer only one cent for every shilling in the sale price, while buyers,
processors, roasters and retailers split the other 99 per cent.
GRAPHIC: MIKE MOSOTA
While
Asia and South America increase coffee production, the African
continent continues to lag. A 2013 study by the Food and Agriculture
Organisation shows that while quotas set by the ICO were in force,
Africa produced 19.1 million 60kg bags of coffee a year, which plummeted
to 15.8 million 60kg bags after the agreement collapsed, suggesting
that quotas concealed inefficiencies on the part of African countries.
In
2014, the gross commodity price paid out to coffee farmers was Sh391.86
per kilogram, according to the Kenya National Bureau of Statistics.
Four years earlier in 2010, the gross commodity price was slightly
higher at Sh396.78 per kilogram.
In December of that
year, farmers who sold their coffee through cooperatives received
Sh76.50 per kilogram, according to a 2013 study by the European
Commission. This means that in 2010, a coffee farmer who had sold
through a cooperative received 19.5 per cent of the auction proceeds,
before accounting for labour and inputs. Going by that proportion, last
year a farmer would have received Sh74.48 per kg for his coffee.
The
EC study complements a breakdown of the coffee value chain, which was
done by the International Labour Organisation in 2004. It found that
levies took up nine per cent of the auction price comprising the Coffee
Board of Kenya (one per cent), the Coffee Research Foundation (two per
cent), Coffee Cess, which is divided between the Roads Board and local
authorities (one per cent) and marketing and auction fees (five per
cent).
Another six per cent of the auction price was
taken up by milling and transportation to the miller, while 20 per cent
was paid out during primary processing.
Kenya has
struggled to navigate the more competitive markets created after the
International Coffee Agreement collapsed in 1989, even if its coffee is
still prized around the world. In fact, Kenyan coffee was more valuable
at auction than both Colombian and Tanzanian coffee for nine of the 15
years from 2000 to 2014, according to available ICO data. In addition to
Kenya, Colombia and Tanzania are the other main producers of Colombian
Mild Arabica Coffee.
DROPPING YIELDS
In
Kenya, coffee yields have shown a declining trend from 1990 to 2014,
although there have been increases in specific years. From the 1990/91
crop year, yields dropped almost by a third from 930 kg/ha to 680 kg/ha.
Large
estates enjoy almost double the yields of smallholder farms on average.
Only on five occasions in the years from 1990 to 2013 have the farmers
who market through cooperatives enjoyed a yield higher than the lowest
yield enjoyed by estates, which was (417kg/ha). These were 1990/91,
1991/92, 1994/95, 1996/96 and 1999/2000.
High yields
were experienced in 1995/96, 1999/2000 and 2011/2012 years. The
increased productivity in these years was attributed to regular payments
to farmers, the reduced presence of diseases, and favourable weather
conditions coupled with the maturing of high-quality varieties of
coffee, respectively
PRICE AND VALUE CHAIN
The
production of coffee in Kenya is influenced by a range of factors,
including weather conditions and diseases. Good prices received in a
certain year, coupled with better farming practices and conducive
weather are often associated with good production in a subsequent year.
For
example, production in the 1999/2000 year was the highest since the
record production in the 1998/1999 year, with a total of 100,700 tonnes
produced. This was a reaction to high prices, according to the Economic Survey, as well as good husbandry practices. Since 1999, production has dropped to 49,500 tonnes in 2013/2014, a drop of 51 per cent.
The
coffee supply of Brazil, the biggest supplier in the world, is known to
have a significant effect on coffee prices. Frost in Brazil usually
leads to global shortages, and subsequent price increases. However,
despite a rise in the global prices of coffee, production in Kenya has
continued to flag.
From 2001 to 2014, auction prices
rose by 67 per cent. However, the coffee sold at auction failed to rise,
staying around 50,000 tonnes. In 2011, the coffee sold at auction
dropped to 30,000 tonnes, before rising to 42,000 tonnes in 2014.
The
amount of land dedicated to coffee has also decreased in recent years.
Historically, smallholders who process their coffee through cooperatives
have usually farmed 75 per cent of all the land that produces coffee in
the country, while estates control the remaining 25 per cent. However,
this proportion seems to be changing.
The loss of
quotas in the wake of the International Coffee Agreement did not lead to
a decrease in land under coffee. The acreage under coffee stayed
largely stable until 2005, when it fell 37 per cent from 170,000 to
106,900 in 2010.
While cooperatives lost 35 per cent
of their acreage, 42 per cent of land under estates was lost.
Provisional figures from the 2013/2014 season show that the coverage has
increased marginally to 110,000 hectares, a rise of just under three
per cent.
In the 2009/2010 season estates made up 23
per cent of all land under coffee. That was the first time since 1988,
when estates fell below 24 per cent. Since then the proportion has
fallen further, to 22 per cent from 2011 to 2014.
One
likely reason for this change is the shifting of land from coffee
growing to other crops, as well as real estate development. Real estate
developments, including Migaa, Thika Greens, Tatu City, sit on land that
once held coffee.
Another likely reason has to do
with the introduction of new varieties of coffee. Historically, Kenya
cultivated the Scotts Laboratory varieties (SL-28 and SL-34) of the
Bourbon cultivar of Arabica coffee.
In 1985, the Ruiru
Coffee Research Station introduced the Ruiru 11 variety, which while
having improved resistance to Coffee Berry Disease and Leaf Rust
disease, had a less attractive taste. In response to these concerns, the
Coffee Research Station created the Batian variety in 2010 which while
also resistant, produces a more attractive taste at the cupping stage.
No comments :
Post a Comment