Saturday, October 31, 2015

READERS' CORNER: None of us has monopoly of knowledge, we’re all different




Graduates during the 37th Kenyatta University
Graduates during the 37th Kenyatta University graduation ceremony on December 19, 2014. Professors, just like pastors, maids, houseboys, herdsboys, watchmen, and ‘mama nguo’ are names that are given to people to designate them for what they do to earn a living. These names do not mean that you have been to heaven or hell and you came back! PHOTO | SALATON NJAU | NATION MEDIA GROUP 
None of us has monopoly of knowledge, we’re all different
Alenga Amadi

Titles are in themselves, false names which people use to earn a living.
Professors, just like pastors, maids, houseboys, herdsboys, watchmen, and ‘mama nguo’ are names that are given to people to designate them for what they do to earn a living. These names do not mean that you have been to heaven or hell and you came back!
There is no real substance in a title, the substance is just a feeling.
There is no knowledge stationed at any university in the world; knowledge is in the mind of the masses. It is not kept in the library or lecture halls or classes anywhere in the world. That is why real universities are merely centres of learning, where search and re-search has to be done to search for the real knowledge out there, by way of research; that is searching for knowledge, from the masses, again and again!
Any university which does not search for knowledge from the masses again and again, is deadwood, and the professors in there, are deadwood professors.
You cannot pretend to have all the knowledge in the world, because nobody knows everything, and nobody knows ‘nothing’. Nothing is impossible to know.
MONOPOLY OF KNOWLEDGE
Nobody has monopoly of knowledge, not even the professors at the leading universities in the world.
Each one of us knows something, even if it is not much.
Harry Mulama knows something, if not much, about professors at the University of Nairobi. He was telling us what he knows about them, and he has a right to his opinion. From what he told us, it is not true that he knows nothing about them.
Those who claim to know more than others, do not need to be defended by any body. What they know is enough (or not enough) to defend them.
When there is criticism of what they are doing in serving others, it means there is not enough ‘to defend’ what they do. They should humble themselves and do enough to defend themselves.
Our history and our past cannot defend us, our titles cannot defend us, our feelings cannot defend us, it is what we do in serving others that will defend us. There is no glory in the past, there is no glory in history, it is just a feeling which cannot stand the test of time. We are fearfully and wonderfully created. God, in His eternal wisdom, created each one of us unique and different. There are no two people who are exactly the same.
We cannot think in the same way, we cannot write in the same way, we cannot look at the same thing and see the same thing. There are no better authors than others, we are just unique in our way of writing and style of telling our stories, and our stories are not even the same, so how are we expected to write in the same way and same style?
Nobody should use his or her style to benchmark others. If God Himself, believed in me and gave me my style, who can tell me otherwise? Those who like your style should follow you and support you. Those who do not like your style should look for the one who tells stories in the way they like and follow him or her.
God gave each one of us life to live, live your life and let others live their lives, do not live your life by controlling other peoples’ lives
When all these professors are gone, will there be still knowledge, or all knowledge will be gone with them? Have a thoughtful day, wont you?

Dr Alenga Amadi, is the chief executive and founder, Career Advisory Centre, Centre for Academic Excellence and Excellent Character Development. Email; alengaamadi@yahoo.com

***
If the felt pen runs out of ink, just grab a pencil and continue writing
Judith Muthambi

It is exactly 2:58 a.m.  I am awake, my head throbbing with relentless ideas for another book.  I pen each of them mercilessly. 
I am unstoppable, even sleep itself has taken flight at the gushing wind of soft scribbles on my bedside writing pad.
I write effortlessly, I write endlessly until a power cut hushes me out.  Even then, the ideas lurk around waiting for the power to return.
In those moments of darkness, Naomi Susa’s words “...write, you do not need anyone’s permission” (Saturday Nation, October 24, 2015) hit me.  It suddenly occurs to me that actually, I do not write because I have or need anyone’s approval.  I write because it is my undying passion.  Writing is my  love, my life.
Just last week, I received two e-mails  from different publishing companies.  One stated that they could not publish my work for one reason or the other.
The other was deeply impressed with the same manuscript. The first voice plastered me with hopelessness while the second gave me hope.
If I smother my heart with self-indignation, I will be blocking the first voice from positive criticism which is a valuable and necessary tool for any upcoming writer. 
Positive criticism can be used realistically to sharpen the world of a writer. 
Namwali Serpell, the recent Caine Prize winner, attested recently that the book that won her the prize was actually a manuscript that a few other publishers had rejected. If a publisher tells you no, you do not sit down and mourn. 
After all, it is not their approval that makes you write.  It is the inner writer’s ink which kicks in when no one is watching. 
It is that night fuel that does not grow dim even when there is a power cut.  It is an oasis of art. Like a crystal-clear river, it will sparkle in the desert, where it was unlikely to thrive, and it will find its way downstream, satisfying certain readers who see value in what you are doing. 
Dear writer, train yourself to hang around like-minded people, take external criticism positively and build upon it.
From time to time use google to find new ideas, listen to others who have made it, but do not smother your effort with self-pity just because this person or the other thinks you are not good enough.
 You are an epic force, a consuming, unstoppable fire that can melt away the frost bite that nibbles on your fingers during those odd morning hours when you arise to write.
If you are still waiting for approval first before you can pen those vibrant ideas, it may be a very long wait.
 Thank you again, Naomi Susa, for reminding us that we do not need anyone’s permission to write. That felt pen of hope may have been crushed by external voices, dear budding writer, but who said that you can’t reach out for the pencil and continue scribbling?

The writer works at St Andrews School, Turi
***
This generation of learners not inspiring at all
by Malowa Malowa

I read Harry Mulama’s article (Saturday Nation, October 10, 2015) and got very excited. I do not want to throw very undeserving epithets at him. I will also not want to say that he was very ‘inhuman’ to our great professors.
This is because there are issues he raised that may not require blanket condemnation.
It is academically refreshing to compare and/or contrast the Ngugi-Anyumba-Taban triumvate with Wanjala-Odhiambo-Indangasi. But it is unfair. The kind of society and circumstances that produced the two groups of academics are different.
The former was immersed in a socio-political and economic struggle against neo-colonialism, disillusionment and political intolerance.
They felt that literature and literary criticism had a place in making the society better. Their vibrancy was so intense that some of them became enemies of state. A few were hounded into prisons as others were forced into exile.
The society of the latter group is completely different. They faced one party dictatorship, sycophancy and corruption.
We saw hurried lecture notes that completely lacked in literary depth as literature teachers and critics shuttled between universities. This was bad enough. But the worst was when they realised that there could be quick money in ‘guide books.’ Students and teachers soon opted for short cuts and the reading of literature books died.
There is an urgent need to consider the state of English and literature in the country. Does it ever bother our professors to whom they will pass their mantle 30 years from now?
Are they ever worried about the quality of English and Literature graduates who come out of their hands?I would plead with Harry Mulama not to allow himself be drawn in the contest about who is who in literary criticism, but rather get worried about our grandchildren.

The writer teaches at Kabarak

***
Writer gave the right advice to young authors

by Ali Dayib

I must admit that Naomi Susa’s article (Saturday Nation, October 17, 2015) was one of the best. She had excellent advice to budding writers, that they don’t need a licence to write.
Upcoming writers are often frustrated by established ones who are supposed to be their mentors. I met Susa last April at the Writers Conference.
Her advice that we could explore new frontiers of writing like cook books, public speaking and ghost writing were important. These are virgin topics in Kenya.Long live Readers Corner.

The writer is a freelance writer

***
We’ve lost confidence in school exams due to leakage

by Ouma Otieno

When I recently contributed in these pages on the woes that bedevil the classroom teacher in an article titled ‘This is why the teaching profession has lost its lustre’ (Saturday Nation, October 17), I received mixed reactions.
It is still fresh in our minds that immediately after the recent teachers’ strike, there was a call to postpone the national examinations for the teachers to compensate for the lost time.
This call was brushed aside by the Kenya National Examinations Council (Knec).
Knec still contracted the very teachers who had not been paid their September salaries to administer the examinations.
When the examinations finally kicked off under the watch of a brand new chief executive office, Dr Joseph Kisilu, we were confident that cases of examination papers leaking to candidates would be minimal. Our poise was short-lived. Examination papers started leaking out to candidates 48 hours before their scheduled time
Knec was somehow quick to blame the social media, in particular, Watsapp. A couple of days later the Cabinet Secretary for Education, Prof Jocob Kaimenyi shifted the blame to police officers.
It is quite appalling when the council and the ministry term the exams papers which are in circulation as trash even after several media houses have confirmed their authenticity.
We teachers are not certain about the future of our students with the soaring examination malpractices.
Dear reader, the council has put the country in an awkward position as those who sit examinations under this system may not easily be accredited to join universities anywhere in the world.
I want to propose a raft of measures.
Firstly, our universities should offer pre-entrance exams to those who intend to join any of their faculties. This is because with cheating in exams, there are cases of those who join faculties such as engineering and medicine and fail to cope.
The council should set more of analysis and comprehension questions that often demand more of critical thinking.
The examination mismanagement is just one ailment in the education sector. There are many others.

The writer is a literary critic and teaches at Ng’iya Girls in Siaya County. oumahotienoh2009@yahoo.com

No comments :

Post a Comment