Corporate News
ICPAK chief executive Patrick Ngumi. PHOTO | FILE
By VICTOR JUMA, vjuma@ke.nationmedia.com
- It remains to be seen whether the regulator will accept the request that would put accountants on equal standing with lawyers who have set minimum fees for their services.
- Audit firms offer their current and prospective clients charge-out rates listing the fees expected to be paid for hiring individual auditors or consultants.
Accountants have set in motion a process that could
introduce minimum fees they can charge for advisory services offered to
different categories of clients, setting businesses up for a possible
escalation of the cost of compliance.
The Institute of Certified Public Accountants of Kenya
(ICPAK) has written to the Competition Authority of Kenya (CAK) seeking
to introduce minimum professional fees in new industry guidelines
expected to come into force mid next year.
CAK’s director general Wang’ombe Kariuki
acknowledged receiving proposals seeking to prescribe the minimum
recommended fees for each category of services. The list of services
included non-assurance, company audits, saccos, pension schemes and
public benefit organisations.
ICPAK’s application is based on sections of the
Competition Act that allows the fixing of industry-wide prices if there
are compelling reasons of public policy to justify them. The
accountants’ body argues that the move would eliminate rampant price
undercutting in the industry.
It remains to be seen whether the regulator will
accept the request that would put accountants on equal standing with
lawyers who have set minimum fees for their services.
Accountants and their clients currently negotiate
and agree on fees without any price guides. ICPAK argues that the status
quo is bad for the professionals and their customers.
“The fees guideline is meant to avoid undercutting,
which compromises the quality of services offered,” said ICPAK’s chief
executive Patrick Ngumi, arguing that accountants are qualified
professionals who go through similar training and should therefore offer
clients the same quality of services across the board.
Dr Ngumi said the current opaque environment has, for instance, led to major discrepancies in the setting of audit fees.
ICPAK said details of the minimum rates were being finalised and would become clear in the coming months.
The fixing of minimum fees is, however, not
expected to stop clients from paying more for assurance and
non-assurance services, including ordinary audit, forensic audit, tax,
management, human resources and management consultancy.
The accountants argue that clients will be free to
pay a premium on the minimum fees if they feel they are getting more in
terms of superior skills, brand or reputation of the audit firm.
Fees paid to external auditors are pegged on hourly
rates and generally represent a multiple of parameters for
compensation, including the skills and scope of work being done.
Senior partners with years of experience, therefore, cost more compared to fresh graduates.
Audit firms offer their current and prospective
clients charge-out rates listing the fees expected to be paid for hiring
individual auditors or consultants. But this has not prevented huge
variations in actual fees charged by various audit firms.
If the proposal to fix minimum fees is accepted, the small audit
firms are expected to be the biggest beneficiaries of the price floor.
“Small firms get squeezed. The minimum fees will help them,”
said Sammy Onyango, the CEO of Deloitte East Africa, adding that the
lack of a price guide has encouraged some companies to play audit firms
against each other in search for the lowest bidder. This has sparked a
race to the bottom that has hurt the quality of work done.
The minimum fees come at a time when new laws and
business realities have entrenched the use of external and internal
auditors, setting the stage for an earnings bonanza for accountants
whose typical monthly compensation are way above the national average.
The new Companies Act requires all companies to
have audited accounts except dormant firms and those whose annual
turnover stands below Sh720 million.
Companies with net assets below Sh620 million are also exempted as are non-profit firms.
Publicly-traded firms – which incur some of the highest audit fees – are required to have both internal and external auditors.
Dr Ngumi said that besides the legal requirements, demand for audit services has been rising due to its benefits to companies.
“Companies are realising that audited accounts give
them an edge when bidding for government tenders or raising funds from
debt and equity investors,” he said.
For accountants, their fees depend on the
complexity of the client’s operations and man-hours needed to complete a
task. A company like Safaricom, for instance, will pay more to external
auditors compared to a property firm, according to accountants.
This is because the telco has several revenue
streams including data and voice that come in various dynamic packages
such as prepaid, post-paid and special limited offers.
An audit of a property company is relatively
easier, especially if it has already hired a valuer of its land and
buildings that make up most of its assets.
In terms of professional work, forensic audit is the most expensive due to its complex and investigative nature.
No comments :
Post a Comment