Opinion and Analysis
By BITANGE NDEMO
Kenya Airways (KQ) is truly the Pride of Africa and
Africa is its home. It is headquartered in Africa, flies to many African
cities, and even non-Kenyans used to be proud of it.
Unfortunately, KQ appears to have adopted a self-defeating
pricing strategy that has made the airline one of the most uncompetitive
in the African skies.
Mother Teresa taught us that, “Love begins at home, and it is not how much we do... but how much love we put in that action.”
Recently, I have begun wondering how much love of
Africa KQ has put into action when it comes to its pricing strategy.
Four cases below elaborate how our love affair with the Pride of Africa
may falter, and I know I am speaking on behalf of many Africans.
In the past one year, I have attended numerous
conferences in African countries. I always request my sponsors to put me
on KQ. Their policies, however, require that they use the best pricing
possible, and, in virtually all cases, KQ has never fallen within that
category.
At one point, I was to attend a conference in
Mauritius. My sponsor put me on Emirates, meaning I would I fly to
Dubai, then back to Mauritius. The entire journey would take 20 hours of
my precious time instead of six.
After a protest, they gave me a second best option:
South African Airways to Johannesburg then to Mauritius for a total of
eight hours. I opted for this arrangement. KQ was fourth best after
Ethiopian Airlines via Addis.
During another trip to Tanzania, I was told the
best air ticket deal was Ethiopian Airlines, which would take me through
Addis then back over the Kenyan airspace to Tanzania.
In other words, go north in order to go south. The
proposed trip would take four hours instead of 56 minutes. I had to top
up from my pocket for a direct flight to Dar es Salaam.
I faced a similar challenge while travelling to
Abuja, Nigeria. Once more, KQ was nowhere in the top three for best
pricing. I used Ethiopian Airlines.
I keep on asking myself: is it that KQ is not aware
of its competitors? Is there a deliberate policy to be expensive at
home? And if it is, why then is KQ making losses?
As I pondered on KQ’s strategic response to these
questions, someone told me that the airline also lags behind in other
products like cargo.
Their attempt to ship a three-tonne cargo from
Accra to Nairobi via KQ failed because the cost was more expensive than
shipping a similar cargo from China, a distance that is almost five
times longer.
Another small enterprise wanted to ship
horticultural products to Djibouti only to be confronted with a pricing
that left them with no income.
Surprisingly, KQ flies to both Accra and Djibouti
daily with its belly empty. One would think the airline would leverage
on small and medium enterprises (SMEs) to grow its Africa market.
No comments :
Post a Comment