By CHARLES ONYANGO OBBO
As I thought about the recent violence in the
Central African nation of Burundi, I recalled a trip I made there three
years ago.
I realised that something I’d seen in 2012 was a key to why
the coup attempt in May by a group of army officers had failed. The
capital city, Bujumbura, is bordered by hills that roll down toward Lake
Tanganyika.
A short drive away, though, is one of the exclusive
resorts you’d expect to find, given the setting: the Hotel Club du Lac
Tanganyika. During my visit, at least, few of the guests were tourists.
Instead, the hotel was bustling with American and European military
advisers.
The reason these trainers were in town was because
Burundi was supplying troops to the African Union’s peacekeeping force
in Somalia, known by its acronym, Amisom.
In 2007, an African Union resolution established
the Somalia mission. Uganda was the first to send in forces. Then, to
the surprise of many, Burundi contributed more than 5,000 soldiers.
Peacekeeping in Somalia quickly became one of
Burundi’s most important economic activities. The monthly take-home pay
of a private in the Burundian Army was about $20. But if he served in
the internationally funded Amisom force, the same soldier was paid $750.
With their Amisom wages, the thousands of Burundian
soldiers soon made up a large part of the country’s new middle class.
Their wealth also helped to create a boom in the housing market around
Bujumbura.
This prosperity came under threat, however, when
President Pierre Nkurunziza announced in April that he would run for a
third term. Critics and opposition politicians cried foul, arguing that
this move broke the Constitution’s two-term limit for the presidency.
Demonstrators clashed with police, and with police
officers using live fire to disperse protesters, as many as 30 people
have been reported killed. Amid the violence, the African Union delayed
the next deployment of Burundi troops - a rebuke that would have been
unthinkable three years ago.
Last month’s coup attempt against Nkurunziza was
thus not primarily because he was clinging to power, but because his
actions had jeopardised the military’s most lucrative prize - its place
in the Somalia peacekeeping operation.
The African Union decision also drew a warning from the State Department that American aid to Burundi could be suspended.
The African Union thus cancelled what was the
principal means by which elements of the military leadership outside
Nkurunziza’s circle of patronage nevertheless enjoyed institutional
benefits.
Burundi’s status has diminished since 2012 for
reasons beyond the control of anyone in Bujumbura, which are more to do
with a reconfiguration of continental politics.
The writer is editor of The Mail and Guardian Africa.
No comments :
Post a Comment