Quitting a job is a big decision for most individuals.
And
while there are many reasons for staff to quit, it can sometimes be
difficult to decide. Here are vital warning signs that you should look
out for:
One
of the main “benefits” companies realise from a merger centres around
the fuzzy corporate buzzword “synergy,” which is the antiseptic-sounding
catchword for layoffs.
While reductions in force (RIF) are part of virtually every business, dignity and respect need to be a part of every RIF.
If they are not, consider looking elsewhere even if you are not laid off.
Growing incompetence
All
too often, organisational cuts go too deep, taking out linchpin
individuals as well as unsung individual contributors, who do the job of
multiple people.
When those superstars exit, the shortcomings of remaining underperformers become more pronounced.
Organisational upheaval tends to reveal organisational incompetence.
While
it’s important to allow for a time of transition, if the incompetency
increases after six months, a refresh of your resume might be in order.
Your boss is clueless about the business
One
of the most unfortunate aspects of a transition is when your incoming
boss doesn’t understand the nature of the business, customer needs or
your role.
The fortunate thing is
that you can usually decipher this particular sign pretty quickly, which
can help shape your ultimate decision to stay or go.
Advancement opportunities are blocked
This is an unavoidable reality that occurs with mergers.
Typically,
open opportunities at the acquired company are filled by individuals
from the acquiring company, who need to be “protected” for some odd
reason.
If your company gets
acquired and vacancies within your organisation are artificially stuffed
with folks from the acquiring firm, it’s a tell tale sign to seriously
consider a proactive career change.
Your advancement options are limited if you stay.
Development programmess are cut
Frequently,
in the rush to realise cost reductions, early casualties are education
benefits, career training or even long-term incentive plans.
Dismantling of those types of employee-focused programmes for the sake of costs is usually a bad long-term sign.
More work, less reward
It’s an acquisition axiom that once the cuts have occurred at a company, the volume of work doesn’t decrease proportionately.
By
definition, a synergy occurs when productivity improves at a lower
cost. While that sounds great to the investment community, the actual
implementation is very demanding on the remaining employees.
The
employees who still have jobs usually get the added workload of excised
personnel, without a commensurate increase in salary, title or
influence.
Once you’re forced into that role, the outcome tends to be physical and emotional burnout.
To avoid that, it’s important to quickly recognise the unsustainability of that arrangement and quit.
These signals are not exhaustive nor unique. They can, and do, occur at organisations at anytime.
While
one or two of these signals might be the post-recession “new normal”
for your organisation, if you see a majority or all of them in place for
several months a career assessment is probably in order.
No comments :
Post a Comment