By JAMES KARIUKI
In Summary
- The principal had defied court orders issued last month requiring him to readmit five expelled students.
- Mr Moindi went on national television to argue readmission would be tantamount to “allowing immorality”.
Sacho High School Principal Richard Moindi was
remanded in custody Friday pending the hearing of a contempt suit
against him on June 4 this year.
High Court Judge Lady Justice Abigail
Mshila said Mr Moindi can win back his freedom if he places a Sh750,000
bond with a similar surety with the court.
The court observed that the
principal had defied court orders issued last month requiring him to
readmit five students expelled from the school and pay Sh150,000 to a
sixth.
Mr Moindi instead decided to go
on national television to argue readmission of the students would be
tantamount to “allowing immorality to thrive unabated”, adversely
affecting discipline in the top performing school.
Judge Mshila expressed disgust at
the principal’s utterances on national television saying it was sheer
disrespect that could not be condoned by the court, whose authority was
now at stake.
“Contempt is contempt. We shall
hear nothing else and I direct all lawyers Paul Amuga, Leina Morentat
and Professor Ojiambo to come to my chambers for a private session,” she
said before adjourning the matter.
Mr Ojienda, who formally filed
papers with the court joining to represent the trustees of the school as
well as the principal, asked for time to enable him prepare for the
suit saying he needed time to go through the papers.
Mr Amuga said the issue was
extremely urgent as the interests of the five students was now in
jeopardy after the school principal convened a special parents’ meeting
where the affected parents were castigated and adverse comments made on
public television regarding the court order.
It is this issue on discussion of
a court matter on public television that incensed the judge with Mr
Moindi being heard commenting immoral activities would go unhindered
since students would know that courts would protect them.
The students were expelled on
March 21 after they were cited for gross indiscipline prompting their
parents to seek a judicial review of the school’s decision saying they
had been denied a chance to be heard and that expulsion was no longer an
available remedy in law.
But Mr Moindi insisted that the
school’s integrity as a well-performing school with high moral
discipline was at stake since the students had misbehaved and that he
was duty-bound by the schools’ owners, among them former Head of State
Daniel arap Moi, to ensure discipline is maintained.
The judge overruled the school
authorities and ordered them to allow the children back to school saying
her hands were tied by the constitutional provision that interests of a
child comes first at all times.
“Even if the school suffers, its
damage can be mitigated in terms of costs since no evidence has been
shown that the students’ parents cannot afford to pay,” she said. “As
for the children, their future is at stake and it is up to the court to
ensure that right to quality education is preserved.”
Despite her order, Mr Amuga said,
the school proceeded to rent dingy premises outside the school for the
students, who only attended classes but had to wait for other students
to leave the dining hall before they could enter.
The school’s security guards also “kept the students in check throughout”, which Mr Amuga described as deplorable.
No comments :
Post a Comment