After a year-long court battle, Equity Bank can finally go ahead and roll-out its thin Sim technology in Kenya.
The
suit dismissed by the High Court Thursday was filed by businessman
Bernard Murage. Mr Murage had argued that Equity Bank had not given
proper assurance to its clients concerning the safety of their personal
data.
However, High Court Judge Isaac Lenaola ruled
that since the Communication Authority and Central Bank of Kenya having
approved the roll-out, the court has no reason to interfere “with the
merit of a decision clearly falling within the relevant statutory agency
without allegations of any irregularities on its part.”
TRIAL BASIS
Last
year, Communication Authority of Kenya allowed Equity Bank, through its
subsidiary, Finserve Africa Limited, to implement the new technology
but on one-year trial basis.
However, a number of
cases filed by individuals and organisation have been stalling the
roll-out but yesterday’s ruling is likely to form a precedent for the go
ahead.
“I am convinced to find that the alleged
innovation will enhance competition in the provision of services and
will be beneficial to those who subscribe to it. I therefore do not see
why this court should intervene and block the roll out of the
technology, the subject of this petition,” Mr Justice Lenaola added.
The
new Sim card is paper-thin and carries an embedded chip. Users overlay
it on their primary SIM regardless of their network and can then use
services from two providers, thus increasing competition.
MPESA SYSTEM
Mr
Murage had sued FinServe, Equity Bank, the Communications Authority as
well as the Central Bank but the judge declined to order the regulator
and CBK to stop the project as requested by him.
The
judge also declined to rule on request made by the petitioner to
consider the concerns of telco Safaricom regarding the technology.
Last
year, Safaricom raised objection to the introduction of the service
saying the technology will compromise security of M-Pesa system exposing
its 19 million money transfer service subscribers to fraud.
“My
answer to that submission is simple; I do not have those concerns on
record and even if I had, Safaricom is not a party to this petition and
it would be against the law for it to agitate its case through third
parties or agents without saying so,” Mr Lenaola said.
“I
therefore find that the alleged threat to right of privacy has not been
proven and the petitioner’s complaints in that regard are dismissed,”
the judge concluded.
No comments :
Post a Comment