Motorists may be forced to keep right while driving on Nairobi
roads if the directive on city roundabouts is not withdrawn, a court was
told on Wednesday.
The court heard that a task force
formed by the county government to restructure intersections at
roundabouts relied on plans drawn by countries that use left-hand-drive
cars to make its report.
The report, according to
Nairobi Senator Mike Sonko — who objected to the new motoring system —
was done by two international consulting companies without a public
survey.
In Kenya, most vehicles are right-hand-drives, which is standard in countries where people drive on the left side of the road.
The
senator stated in an affidavit that coming up with the left-hand drive
model, "which is applicable in the US and Germany, has nothing ingenious
to our prevailing situation in the country."
According to the senator, the decision appeared hell-bent on forcing Kenya into a right-hand motoring nation.
"I
believe that even though Kenya has a right to undertake projects with
development partners no such right extends to such parties to impose
decisions affecting Kenyans without involving them since our vehicles
and road structures are all primarily geared and structured to
right-hand drive motoring," the senator stated through lawyer Harrison
Kinyanjui.
‘STEAL MONEY’
The
senator said the report was meant "to steal money from the government,
arising from cooked-up cost estimates for each implied corrective
measure".
He stated that the final report contains
left-hand-drive illustrations of the proposed intersections on the
affected roundabouts and concludes it was a shoddy cut-and-paste job
from some left-hand-drive country.
He told the court
that from the affidavit of the State Department of Transport sworn by
John Kipng'etich Mosonik, "the total cost of Sh400 million paid to HB
Gauff Consulting Engineers from Germany and Mott-MacDonald Consultants
from Britain is unjustified and cannot form a proper report to be
adopted by the Nairobi County government."
In the suit,
the two companies are also accused of failing to carry out a public
survey as provided for under Article 10 of the Constitution.
‘PURE GUESSWORK’
"It
appears to be pure guess work, figures do not factor in the expenses of
relocating roads to conform with the illegal requirements where traffic
was redirected, neither does the entire process of arriving at the
report reflect the principles of public participation," the petition
filed in court reads.
"There is no estimate even of the
relocation of services as set out in the final report of the task force
and yet they got paid for a shoddy process the sum of Sh30 million for
the report, which Engineer Mosonik relies on," the petition reads.
Sonko
said it was irrational to use the said task force report as it is "not
signed and not dated", contrary to the legitimate expectation created by
the Kenya Gazette notice number 1558 of March 2, 2015, which he seeks to quash before the court.
The
hearing of the petition was adjourned on Wednesday after it emerged
that the county government had failed to comply with the trial court's
directive to file a reply.
FILE SUBMISSIONS
On
April 16, Justice Weldon Korir directed the parties mentioned — the
Transport Cabinet secretary, the State Department of Transport, the
Kenya Roads Board, the Kenya Urban Roads Authority, the Kenya National
Highways Authority and the Attorney-General — to respond and file
submissions for an inter partes hearing
So far, only the Attorney-General has complied.
Mr
Kinyanjui said he was being ambushed by the county government, whose
replying affidavit was served during the court session, eventually
forcing the adjournment.
A lawyer representing the
county said it had been difficult to obtain prompt proof of the public's
involvement in the decision-making "as the documents attesting to this
were being audited".
The court on Wednesday directed that all parties in the matter comply and file their responses before June 4.
No comments :
Post a Comment