By MIKE ELDON, mike.eldon@depotkenya.org
The other day, dotted around my mixed salad, I
enjoyed both the sight and the taste of those small sweet cherry
tomatoes, and I was reminded of seeing them grow at a research farm in
Israel’s Negev desert during my visit there early this year.
Driving south along the perfectly smooth road through the
Negev, the landscape indeed became distinctly desert-like, with signs
warning us to beware of camels crossing the road.
At the research centre we first watched a film
about the activities there. We saw the farmers and their families in
action, how they had left everything behind to risk it all in this arid
area, and how, supported by expert mentors, they had struggled to learn
the tricks of the trade and to harvest their first cherry tomatoes.
New varieties of cherry tomatoes were developed in
Israel 40 years ago, where the celebrated drip irrigation system was
also dreamed up, and next we were taken by our guide, Gadi Grinblat, to
see a plastic-covered field of the tiny tomatoes.
Mr Grinblat was a great story-teller, explaining
how over the last 20 years the researchers there have been seeking ways
of continuously improving the crop and how it is cultivated.
Whether it is tomatoes (8,000 tonnes a year come
from this area), or grapes for wine (150,000 bottles a year are filled
in the Negev), or peppers or cucumbers or olives or cotton, the central
question was how to grow them in sand, in which normally absolutely
nothing survives as it is completely incapable of holding water.
Here though it’s different. The tomato plants use
95 per cent of the water dripped onto their roots, each one receiving an
identical amount. And with no water anywhere else there’s no incentive
for insects or weeds to flourish.
Mr Grinblat listed the three, soon four, possible
sources of water: piped from the Sea of Galilee 300 kilometres to the
north, which until 20 years ago was the only option; desalinated water
from the Mediterranean, 100 kilometres away; in a year from now, through
recycled water from the army camp being constructed 15 kilometres away;
or from the brackish salty water 900 metres below them.
All but the last alternative cost lots of money to
supply, but it was far from obvious that the local water would allow the
plants to grow.
That’s what much of the research has been all
about, and the good news is that, alternating with some sweet water (all
computer-controlled) tomatoes and melons largely fed on brackish water
are actually sweeter.
Mr Grinblat enthusiastically explained how they use
bees to pollinate the plants; how they hang the stems from above to
take up less land and allow the crops to be more accessible; and how
they experiment with different shapes and colours, and for the cherry
tomatoes, different arrangements on the stems.
‘‘Here we can play, as we don’t grow to sell and survive,’’ he said.
For their mission is to improve the livelihoods of
farmers in Israel and elsewhere, by offering the results of their
learning to others.
Mr Grinblat then took us to see grapes on the vine,
tickled into growing out of season through increasing the temperature
10 degrees by placing a plastic cover over them in winter, thereby
enabling two harvesting seasons a year.
He showed us their truffle mushrooms, the most expensive in the world (in New York they go for Sh92,260 ($1,000) a kilo).
The cost of these mushrooms is partly so high because
they don’t grow under every plant, and you don’t know which ones will
deliver the goods and which ones won’t — until the researchers here will
have scratched their heads over the problem some more.
Do we have researchers scratching their heads like this in
Kenya? We do. Do agricultural research institutions exist here? Yes
again, both local and international, and they do great work.
Our challenge is not really the quality of the research itself but the dissemination of its consequences.
This is not something that happens automatically.
Serious budgets must be allocated, including for marketing as well as
for the technical expertise required. Not least for helping our farmers
to be bold enough to consider new approaches.
There is so much scope for ramping up our
agricultural productivity, whether through planting better quality seeds
or appropriate application of fertiliser, whether through irrigation or
post-harvest storage, or through other means of moving beyond mere
subsistence levels. (Don’t even get me going on reversing land
fragmentation.)
Yet we know farmers, here as in most parts of the
world, are renowned for their conservative attitudes and their
scepticism regarding change.
“We tried it before and it failed,” we hear too
often, or simply “we lack the resources”. Added to this is the high
average age of our farmers, although more recently a few Young Turks
have been entering what has been until recently the most unglamorous of
occupations.
We celebrate the new energy and knowledge about
farming being spread through our Saturday papers; we cheer on those
doing good work in research; we applaud the young (and some not so
young) Kenyans finding new ways of farming; and we encourage the
emerging emphasis on irrigation.
Of course too we gasp at the performance of the horticulture sub-sector (which has been much assisted by Israelis).
Now we need to bring all this together and
transform our thinking on what farming is and how it can deliver so much
more than it has been doing.
When I was in Israel, the Galilee International
Management Institute signed a deal with Vihiga Governor Moses Akaranga
to work together to double the county’s agricultural output in two
years.
And if in Vihiga, why not elsewhere in Kenya? Come
on, young Kenyans, grasp the opportunity, as you have done in IT and in
other fields.
And come on, Kenyan universities, emulate the folk
from Galilee. We can do much more, and there’s no better way than by
emulating those curious and determined Israelis.
No comments :
Post a Comment