By The Citizen
In Summary
- But, as the clock ticks, support for the new Katiba has dropped, with a large number still undecided. Some 26 per cent would vote “no” while a significant 22 per cent are still undecided.
About 52 per cent of people on the Mainland
would have voted for the Proposed Constitution had the referendum been
held between January and February this year, according to a Twaweza
opinion poll.
But, as the clock ticks, support for the new Katiba has dropped, with a large number still undecided. Some 26 per cent would vote “no” while a significant 22 per cent are still undecided.
But, as the clock ticks, support for the new Katiba has dropped, with a large number still undecided. Some 26 per cent would vote “no” while a significant 22 per cent are still undecided.
Going with this data, the support for the new
Katiba has shifted from 65 per cent last year to 52 per cent while the
opposition advanced from 21 per cent to 26 per cent during the same
period. According to the study, which was carried out from 17 January to
17 February this year and involving 1,399 respondents in Tanzania
Mainland alone, 65 per cent disagree with Ukawa’s decision to boycott
the referendum.
We should challenge pollsters like Twaweza to
conduct further polls countrywide so that we get a clearer picture of
what the people say about the much-debated referendum.
We are not certain, for example, that all the 23
million eligible voters have had a glimpse of what the Proposed
Constitution looks like—let alone read and understood it. Very few
copies have been distributed to the people, who are the owners of the
Constitution. For all we know, this might be a deliberate move. It could
also be simply an oversight.
Either way, we can only guarantee a fair
referendum if either the government or the naysayers—or even both camps,
for that matter—distributes copies of the Second Draft presented to the
Constituent Assembly (CA) by the Constitutional Review Commission
(CRC).
People’s wishes
This, in our view, would make it possible for
voters to compare the documents and ultimately establish which one
represents the people’s wishes. We are aware that the second draft has
been a rare commodity—meaning very few people have had a chance to read
it.
The constitution is not the property of the ruling
CCM or the Coalition of Defenders of the People’s Constitution, known
generally as Ukawa. It is not the property of any religion or tribe. It
is not the property of the President or the Cabinet. It does not belong
to our learned brothers and sisters. Nor does it belong to the media.
The Constitution belongs to the people. We need to
come to terms with the fact that no one has the right to hijack the
process from the people, no matter the circumstances. The
people—regardless of their social, economic, political or physical
status—own the constitution lock, stock and barrel.
President George Washington summed it this way in
his 1796 farewell address: “The heart of our system of government is the
right of the people to make and alter their Constitutions of
Government…for the people to control the constitution, it must not say
what they said but it must mean what they meant.”
We suggest that both sides—Yes and No—launch a
special awareness campaign to bring voters up to speed on every chapter
and verse of the draft constitution. If done properly, this would lead
us to a fair and credible outcome.
No comments :
Post a Comment