By PETER MUTUA
In Summary
In 2005 a company in Nakuru introduced a crop said to be the solution to local farmers’ woes.
It was suited for the local soils and climate, had a ready
market through the company that was connected to an international
pharmaceutical company and had a relatively short maturity cycle.
Farmers were promised two crops every season.
The crop was artemesia, the source of the
artemisinin extract that goes into malaria’s artemisinin-based therapy
that was introduced to conquer malaria’s growing resistance to
chloroquine.
Using data obtained from a patch of land leased
from a local large scale wheat grower, farmers were presented with
evidence that they would double or triple incomes compared to what they
get from cereals.
What the farmers did not know was that the large
scale grower had negotiated a contract in which he would get a handsome
reward regardless of how the crop turned out; he would not agree to
plant the crop under the conditions offered to the local farmers.
Leaders of Family Business swallowed the bait. The
first year went moderately well. Those who requested seedlings got them
albeit in smaller numbers than ordered. Payments were quick and
efficient. The second year proved more challenging; the company
struggled to cope with demand for seedlings, causing delays in planting
which subsequently affected yields.
Disaster struck in year three; farmers, encouraged
by the results they had seen on neighbours’ farms went into artemesia
production in big numbers. They put other agricultural interests like
dairy on the back burner in anticipation of a windfall.
Without notice, the company changed the payment
system, reducing the amount due to the farmers based on artemisinin
content which drastically affected their earnings. This move was
followed by delays in payment that crippled many family owned
businesses.
It would be sad if this were an anomaly; an unusual
occurrence that happens to Leaders of Family Business once every
generation. Unfortunately, this tragically happens every few years.
In 2007 it was the pyramid schemes, in 2009 it was
multilevel marketing of herbal products, in 2011 quails and in 2013 it
was the rearing of rabbits.
Each one of these ventures is lucrative to those
who have taken time to understand the business intricacies, identify and
mitigate against draw backs. They ordinarily have been in business long
enough and continue to thrive long after interlopers have left. The
smart ones even use clueless newcomers for their own benefit by egging
them on and supplying them with materials at exorbitant prices.
‘Investors’ who, imagining these to be business
opportunities in which they can make overnight fortunes, join the
bandwagon midstream. They end up as helpless spectators to a disastrous
crash scene in which they are the main victims.
In a world of instant fixes, fortunes made
overnight and ever accelerating product cycles, one of the most often
overlooked factor affecting the founding, establishment and eventual
success of many family business ventures is time.
Unrealistic expectations
A few aspiring Leaders of Family Business
understand how important it is to gain a reputation for
expertise/performance in specific areas that can only be obtained by
remaining in this space long enough.
No comments :
Post a Comment