Kenyan banks have dismissed remarks by the
International Monetary Fund that they are not setting aside enough cash
to shield themselves against shocks that could arise from bad debts.
The
banks say the lending system in Kenya is well-structured to cushion
lenders from any eventualities caused by borrowers who fail to honour
their repayments.
In its February 3
statement, IMF said although Kenyan banks are profitable and
well-capitalised, their failure to adequately provide for bad loans
exposes them to shocks.
“The banking
sector remains profitable and well-capitalised but provisions are lately
lagging behind a pickup in non-performing loans,” IMF said. The
Treasury has also, in this year’s budget policy paper, asked the Central
Bank to be more stringent in monitoring banks to ensure adequate
provision for bad loans.
BAD LOANS
In an interview with Smart Company,
however, Kenya Commercial Bank chief executive officer Joshua Oigara
attributed the observation by IMF to a mismatch in the country’s lending
regime in relation to mature markets.
“The
lending system in Kenya is predominantly collateral- (security) based.
Seventy per cent of the total value of the loan and regulations also
require a further one per cent cover of the loan value to be applied
which increases the more a loan stays in default,” said Mr Oigara, who
is also the chairman of the Kenya Bankers Association.
Mr
Oigara said locally, lenders are well-protected from effects of bad
loans due to the prudential guidelines by the Central Bank and the
lending regime used.
Central Bank has
stipulated five stages that an un-serviced loan goes through before it
is declared a loss. Banks are required to set aside an amount equivalent
to the bad loan as cover.
A loan
which falls overdue by up to 30 days is classified as normal with banks
required to set aside one per cent of the loan amount as cover, which is
besides its security that is 70 per cent of the loan.
Loan
that has been defaulted for between one and three months is declared as
“watch” and the lender is required to cover it with 3 per cent of the
loan value.
Under-provisioning for
bad loans is said to expose lenders to financial difficulty or even
collapse if a large number of borrowers fail to meet their obligations.
FRESH GUIDELINES
A
substandard loan is one that remains un-serviced beyond three to six
months and the Central Bank requires a lender to set aside 20 per cent
of the loan amount as cover in the event of default.
Loans
whose repayments fall behind for between six months and one year, and
one year onwards are classified as doubtful and loss respectively. They
attract 100 per cent provisioning (cover).
“Therefore,
by the time a loan is at the level of doubtful or loss, full provision
for the same has been passed through the books. Considering the loan is
fully provided for and the collateral is held by the bank, the coverage
is above even the loan value,” argued Mr Oigara.
In
mature markets, however, lending is mainly based on a borrowers’
character, a thing that Mr Oigara said calls for higher provisioning
measures unlike in a collateral-based lending.
“In
a character-based lending model where no collateral is availed or
required, all the cover available is in the form of provisions,” the
banker’s chairman noted.
The debate
on how well to prepare against effects of bad loans has preoccupied
stakeholders in the financial sector globally in the past few years
following the 2007/2009 financial crisis that hit lenders in the West.
According
to Central Bank’s latest data, in December non-performing loans in
Kenya stood at Sh107.1 billion — the highest in six years — rising by
30.9 per cent compared to a similar period in 2013.
Fresh
guidelines on capital adequacy ratios come into force in January as the
regulator strives to ensure lenders are properly prepared to absorb any
shocks in the market such as bad loans.
CAPITAL BUFFER
A
capital buffer refers to additional capital above the minimum
regulatory ratios and they enable banks to continue lending even in
difficult times since the buffers are used to absorb any resultant
losses without breaching the minimum regulatory capital limit.
The
new rules require all lenders to maintain a minimum core capital to
risk-weighted assets ratio — a measure of a bank’s financial strength
based on what shareholders have put in — of 10.50 per cent, up from the
current eight per cent.
The banks are
also required to maintain a total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio
— a measure of a bank’s financial strength based on total capital
including items such as goodwill and revaluation — of 14.50 per cent, up
from the current 12 per cent.
“The
buffers have enabled the banks to absorb additional loan loss provisions
required for the slight increase in non-performing loans registered in
2014,” CBK notes.
No comments :
Post a Comment