Sunday, December 7, 2014

Security problems are deeper than just Lenku and Kimaiyo

Security officers patrolling the streets of Lamu Island when residents were protesting the move by former Inspector-General of Police David Kimaiyo to extend the curfew. PHOTO | KALUME KAZUNGU | NATION MEDIA GROUP
Security officers patrolling the streets of Lamu Island when residents were protesting the move by former Inspector-General of Police David Kimaiyo to extend the curfew. PHOTO | KALUME KAZUNGU | NATION MEDIA GROUP 
By GEORGE KEGORO
More by this Author
The question in the mind of everyone of the country is whether the changes made by the President to the country’s security leadership after the Mandera terrorist massacres, will be sufficient to address the insecurity the country is going through.
The removal of Interior Secretary Joseph ole Lenku and the retirement of Inspector General of Police David Kimaiyo represents a number of paradoxes, with direct implications on the country’s security situation.
Plucked from the obscurity of a career in the hotel industry, the country had never heard of Lenku before he became Interior Secretary, in theory the most powerful minister in the country. In practice, however, Lenku was a paper tiger, whom nobody took seriously, and who controlled nothing.
It appears the sole basis for choosing him was tokenism, something that Jubilee had to do to avoid accusations that its administration lacked regional balance. The appointment of Lenku was also based on the Jubilee experiment of sourcing ministers from the “professional” rather than political ranks. On the evidence of Lenku’s performance, the experiment has failed.
VICTIM OF CIRCUMSTANCES
Given that Lenku was never actually in charge of the security of the country, in the first place, it is tempting to view him as a victim of circumstances. He has been removed only because, being visible but weak, he provided the perfect sacrificial lamb when the need to blame somebody for the country’s security lapses arose. However, in defence of his removal, it can be argued that he had to go because, having been given the opportunity to establish himself in his new position, he showed an inability to do so.
Most of what is said about Lenku is also true about Kimaiyo. As the first Inspector General of Police, Kimaiyo had the opportunity to shape this new office, where he became the leader of a troika made up of himself and two deputies, one for the Administration Police and the other for the regular police, the two police formations the new Constitution had merged. One problem Kimaiyo never resolved was the mutual resistance to integration by the two police formations, which were previously independent of each other.
In practice, the AP have no real work, other than regime policing, which makes them a pet of the political establishment. Because they have direct ties to the top, the AP easily ignored Kimaiyo. On its part, the regular police, under the leadership of Grace Kaindi, a political outsider, has remained rudderless and irrelevant. Since the political establishment has the AP, it does not need the regular police, whose deterioration it does not exactly mind.
The void created by the decline of the regular police has been filled by the rising AP and the Directorate of Criminal Investigations which, like the AP, attracts direct political support that enabled it to also bypass Kimaiyo. Under the Jubilee government, the DCI is more important than ever before. The DCI has thrived because the police is run informally. Under the circumstances, Kimaiyo, like Lenku, controlled nothing.
CHOSE PERSONAL SURVIVAL
The temptation to feel sorry for him is only reduced by the fact that, having grown in the police system, Kimaiyo had a better chance of establishing himself in office than Lenku whose attraction, it seems, was his pliability. Further, Kimaiyo embraced amendments to the Police Service Act, that took away not only the autonomy of the Police Service Commission, but also his own. He was in a position to resist these changes but, it seems, he chose personal survival over the common good.
The militarisation of the country, another unique feature of the Jubilee regime, further complicates the work of the police. Ignoring the police, the President works with the military in select domestic law enforcement situations, reflecting his close personal ties with the Chief of General Staff, Julius Karangi. Since the President has Karangi, he did not need Lenku or Kiamiyo.
The incongruity, again, is that while responsibility for internal security lay with Lenku and Kimaiyo, the two did not have a free hand to manage security because the military has become a central player in internal security.
The failure to establish the promised commission of inquiry into the Westgate debacle reflects the relationship between the President and the military.
Because the situation permits him to do so, the least that Interior Secretary-designate, Joseph Nkaissery, can do is demand that, before he assumes office, Karangi should first retire. If Karangi remains, Nkaissery will be unable to establish himself in office and will end up like Lenku, accountable for security, but with no authority to be effective. If, for good measure, the DCI director can also retire, this will allow Nkaissery the free hand needed to be effective.
The evidence shows that the management of security is highly personalised around the presidency, with informal reporting channels that undermine formal structures. Irrespective of titles, ethnicity is a factor in determining who is important and who is not. De-ethicising and formalising security decision-making remains an unmet challenge in the Jubilee government.
As the President reshuffles his security team, he should do the same for his communication team which, like security, has badly let the country down.
While Manoah Esipisu remains an inspired choice, his work is undermined by the frivolous entity calling itself the Presidential Strategic Communication Unit. Without a real role, the entity struggles for relevance and has lately turned into attack dogs, imagining this is what the President desires of them. Unless the President actually desires them to attack government critics on his behalf, he must disband this group which cheapens his office

No comments :

Post a Comment