Opinion and Analysis
By LENA KIMENCU
President Kenyatta recently signed the Finance Act
2014, which will see the revival of Capital Gains Tax. The tax will
focus on property transactions, real estate, mining industry and capital
markets.
The tax rate will be at five per cent, which will be half the previous rate that was suspended in 1985.
The tax was suspended in a bid to attract
investments in capital markets, real estate and mining sectors. So the
question that this development begs is, has Kenya’s financial standing
reached an optimal point that maybe there is no more need to attract
investors to these particular sectors?
The answer of course is a resounding no. Actually
far from it, as it stands Kenya has a very huge budget deficit and a
huge debt ratio of 57 per cent which increased from 52 per cent after
the Eurobond was issued.
What will be of interest is how this tax will
affect the common Wanjiku. It will be interesting to see how this tax
will affect the real estate, mining and capital markets.
The real estate sector will likely see an increase
in its already escalated prices. However, on the positive side this
might also reduce the level of speculation of prices in the sector.
It could be argued that the tax will shun investors
from the still budding mining sector in Kenya. However as it is, the
sector is still very young and the resources (such as oil) are in demand
all over the world and therefore the impact of taxation will be very
small in derailing the exploration.
It is also, hopefully, through this tax that
average Kenyans will be able to benefit from the resources in their land
because otherwise most of the exploration and profit will go to foreign
investors. This is a problem that has affected many developing African
countries such as the Democratic Republic of Congo and Chad.
Since the Act is not explicit on how capital
markets will be affected, the effect of the tax in the Nairobi bourse
will depend on how KRA will interpret the law.
In case the tax is to be imposed most local and
foreign investors will feel the pinch the hardest. Kenya has followed
many other African countries in adopting the tax. For instance South
Africa adopted it in 2001. Currently in East Africa most countries have
adopted this tax.
For instance Tanzania has hers at 20 per cent while
Uganda’s is 30 per cent. Notably though some countries such as
Mauritius and Seychelles do not impose this tax. This could mean that
Kenya could lose on its attractiveness as the gateway to East Africa to
these two islands.
The writer is a tax advisor at Nexus Business
Advisory. The views expressed here are her own and do not necessarily
represent the views of Nexus Business Advisory.
No comments :
Post a Comment