By ALLAN OLINGO
In Summary
- Between 2008 and 2011, international climate funds contributed $130 million a year to sub-Saharan Africa to adapt to climate change.
- Ethiopia allocates an average of $440 million a year to climate action with international funding contributing $88 million.
- Tanzania spent $383 million annually on climate change related activities. It receives $237 million per year from donors against an additional funding of $500 million per year needed to address current climate risks.
- Uganda’s draft climate change policy requires $258 million per year; current public spending is $25 million per year.
- Kenya’s average annual spending is $130 million.
Stingy climate change spending by donors is forcing poor sub-Saharan countries to revert to their national budgets.
According to a new report by the Overseas
Development Institute (ODI), between 2008 and 2011, Ethiopia committed
14 per cent of its national budget to climate change, or nearly half of
the national spending on primary education, while Tanzania spent five
per cent, which is almost two-thirds of its health spending, between
2009 and 2012.
The report shows that in Ethiopia, climate
spending amounts to only six per cent of estimated need, Uganda 10 per
cent, while for Tanzania, where more official development aid goes
through the budget, it accounts for 59 per cent.
At the 2009 UN climate summit in Copenhagen, most
developed nations promised to channel up to $30 billion in “fast start”
climate finance to vulnerable countries between 2010 and 2012, rising to
an annual $100 billion by 2020. Kenya and other East African nations
are in line to receive a share of that aid but this seems not to have
pulled through.
ODI executive director Kevin Watkins said that
climate change has a huge impact on poor countries, threatening the
lives of hundreds of millions of people, what with increasingly
unpredictable rainfall, severe droughts and rising sea levels.
“While richer countries invest heavily in
flood-defence systems, coastal protection and other projects, poorer
countries in sub Saharan Africa are struggling with these challenges,
hence diverting the scarce resources, potentially reversing the progress
made in tackling poverty,” Mr Watkins said
To show the inconsistence, between 2008 and 2011,
international climate funds contributed $130 million a year to
sub-Saharan Africa to adapt to climate change, a fraction of the $1.1
billion that the United Kingdom alone spent on its domestic flood
defences in 2008.
According to the report, Ethiopia allocates an
average of $440 million a year to climate action with international
funding contributing $88 million. Tanzania, on the other hand, spent
$383 million annually on climate change related activities. It receives
$237 million per year from donor aid against an additional funding of
$500 million per year needed to address current climate risks.
Uganda’s draft climate change policy is supported
by an implementation strategy that costs $258 million per year compared
with current public spending in the region of $25 million per year.
“Over the four years, both Ethiopia and Tanzania
committed $1.5 billion. For countries with such large human development
deficits these expenditures come with significant opportunity costs.
Spending on climate change runs the risk of crowding out urgently needed
spending in other priority areas,” Mr Watkins said.
Kenya has an average annual spending of $130
million funded through the national budget, to fund climate change
activities. It is also estimated that the annual cost of climatic shocks
to Kenya alone is $494 billion — about 2 per cent of its GDP. Kenya is
also poised to become the biggest aid earner in the region after it was
allocated $2.227 billion by the United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change (UNFCCC).
In April, the British Minister of State at the
Department of Energy and Climate Change Gregory Baker announced a $57
million spending on Kenya from the UK’s International Climate Fund.
No comments :
Post a Comment