By The Citizen
Posted Tuesday, August 19 2014 at 11:00
Posted Tuesday, August 19 2014 at 11:00
In Summary
- Whatever the shortcomings of Mr Mugabe may be – he is no angel, as no-one else is – the West’s criticism of the now 90-year-old, respect-deserving statesman, is mostly excessive and unjustified.
If someone wants to justify mistreatment of a
dog – so goes the moral of an old saying – the person starts off by
giving the animal, which, paradoxically, is known as man’s best friend, a
bad name. There are, in that saying, echoes of the shabby treatment
that Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe is subjected to by the Western
world.
Whatever the shortcomings of Mr Mugabe may be – he
is no angel, as no-one else is – the West’s criticism of the now
90-year-old, respect-deserving statesman, is mostly excessive and
unjustified. The West’s holier-than-thou disposition is both laughable
and inexcusable, bearing in mind that Western powers introduced
colonialism in Africa, the bitterness of which the people of several
countries on the continent and elsewhere tasted.
One of them is Mzee Mugabe; a good part of his
pre-independence life having been divided between a long, 10-year prison
spell, and vanguard leadership of the liberation struggle. Yet, in the
eyes of the Western world, Rhodesian Prime Minister Ian Smith was
saluted as a hero while Mugabe, an accomplished intellectual, among
other attributes, was demonized.
And long after the country had become independent
and was renamed Zimbabwe to express its primary belongingness to the
Black majority, he is mercilessly vilified.
Understandably, Africa has by and large stood by
President Mugabe and Zimbabwe. Tanzania, for one, has a long and
cherished relationship with both; the man having been a frequent visitor
to our country, which hosted many training camps for various liberation
movements in southern Africa.
Tanzania’s role
President Mugabe has been reciprocal, greatly
appreciating the role that Tanzania played in the noble cause, by doing
which it risked incurring the wrath of Rhodesia’s racist regime, and the
broader colonial, racist and imperialist bloc.
It was a risk worth taking, because, as founding
President Mwalimu Nyerere often reminded his compatriots, Tanzania’s
independence would be complete only after the whole of Africa had become
fully liberated.
Against that background, Africa should critically
reflect on, and deeply digest President Mugabe’s sentiments at Victoria
Falls at the weekend, as he took up the Southern African Development
Community (Sadc) chairmanship.
He decried inadequate acknowledgement of, and
honour to the bloc’s founder presidents, of whom Zambia’s Dr Kenneth
Kaunda is the only survivor.
Mzee Mugabe recalled that, Sadc’s precursor, the
Southern African Co-ordination Conference (SADCC) was instrumental in
forming the Frontline States entity, whose child, the African Liberation
Committee, co-ordinated guerrilla and associated initiatives that
ultimately rid the sub-continent of colonialism.
The president was right on cue by stressing the
need for Mwalimu Nyerere, Dr Kaunda, liberation committee chairman
Brigadier General (rtd) Hashim Mbita, and many other individuals who
played sterling roles in the cause, to be given fitting accolades.
No comments :
Post a Comment