Saturday, June 21, 2014

Ironies stalk the current crisis in war-torn Iraq

Iraqi men who volunteered to join the fight against a major offensive by jihadists in northern Iraq stand on army trucks as they leave a recruiting center in the capital Baghdad on June 13, 2014. US President Barack Obama told reporters at the White House on Friday that putting troops on the ground was not on the table. PHOTO/AFP
Iraqi men who volunteered to join the fight against a major offensive by jihadists in northern Iraq stand on army trucks as they leave a recruiting center in the capital Baghdad on June 13, 2014. US President Barack Obama told reporters at the White House on Friday that putting troops on the ground was not on the table. PHOTO/AFP 
By Randall Smith
More by this Author
As the US aircraft carrier, named George HW Bush, heads to Iraq, there is more irony than can be imagined in the collapse of a country where nearly 5,000 Americans lost their lives to supposedly restore democracy.

 
The war was started in 2003 because President George W Bush, the son of President George HW Bush, convinced Congress that Saddam Hussein was hiding weapons of mass destruction.
The allegation was false and the American invasion set off an intense civil war between Islam’s two largest sects that continues to date.
Here is the tip of the ironies: President Barack Obama who opposed the invasion more than a decade ago is using the same laws as his predecessor to launch drones over Iraq.
Those drones, ironically, were requested by the Baghdad government which was a US enemy 12 years ago.
Another turnabout: Iranians, who have been at odds with America since the 1970s will likely use military force to save the day for the Shiite government. The US defeated Saddam, which Iran could not do, and now Iran has a regional ally.  
Soon, Iran will have an atomic weapon: Might Baghdad inherit that technology as well? How will Saudi Arabia which is run by a Sunni royal family react? How will Israel which is deeply worried about Iran’s nuclear capability respond?
COUNTRIES RUN LIKE COLONIES
The US misunderstood the problems in 2003 and continues to misunderstand them today. Iraq is a country constructed by British colonisers. In reality, like much of the Middle East and Africa, the nation has many factions. Religion plays a big role – Kurds in the north, Sunnis in the middle and Shiites everywhere.
Countries put together by colonisers are difficult to manage. Different populations are forced to live together, and they often dislike each other. The countries were set up to benefit the colonisers – not the citizens.
They are held together by military/religious dictatorships and families like the Assads of Syria. They are run much like colonies by those in charge.
So an invasion is like a poison pill. No matter what side you’re on, you can’t win. The US made an incorrect assumption that Iraqis would rejoice over the overthrow of Saddam. Once the dictator was captured, many believed, the war would be over.
The election of a Shiite government was a testament to democracy, according to American thought. But it was simply a reflection of the reality that there were more Shiites than Sunnis or Kurds in Iraq.
There can be no unity without serious reconciliation. Nelson Mandela knew this. So did George Washington. In Baghdad, there was retribution. That is why the radical Sunni movement which is linked to al-Qaeda is sweeping easily from city to city.
Perhaps the greatest irony is this: President Obama understands these issues but has been placed into a corner. To save his legacy, he must embrace and defend the mistakes of his predecessor.
rsmith4825@gmail.com
advertisement

No comments :

Post a Comment