Opinion and Analysis
By MARVIN SISSEY
In Summary
- What’s the point of celebrating growth when people can hardly smile?
I can’t remember the last time I actually
memorised the lyrics of any song. My zero musical talent is an open
secret. It helps of course that the lyrics to this particular song
have some jingle like smooth tide to it.
‘‘Because I am happy /clap along if you feel like a
room without a roof/Because I am happy/ clap along if you feel like
happiness is the truth/Because I am happy/clap along if you know what
happiness is to you/Because I am happy/clap along if you feel like
that’s what you wanna do….’’ Let’s just say that Pharrell William’s
latest song, Happy, makes me, well, happy.
It’s on this happy juncture that I start my final column of my three part series analysing GDP and its statistical shortfalls.
A fortnight ago, I sought to explain the economic
absurdities of GDP rebasing. Last week, I attempted to explain why
relying on GDP as a measure of national wellbeing is a tad misleading.
Today, I seek to throw another spanner in the works.
I wish to submit that a country’s leadership
should take it upon itself to care not just for the economic growth of
its people but to go a step further and care about their general
happiness too.
In fact, I further wish to submit that the latter
step should probably be given more attention since, as I will explain
shortly, happy people are more likely to grow their economic wealth more
organically than unhappy people ever could.
This concept of national happiness is not a novel one. Let me take you back to 1776.
When Thomas Jefferson drafted the United States
Declaration of Independence, this particular phrase is seen to be
fundamental to the whole fabric that later inspired the country into a
global superpower barely two centuries later, “We hold these truths to
be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed
by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are
Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.”
It is not the destination of happiness that is
promised but its pursuit. Could the fact that this destination was
fundamentally never intended to be arrived at be the reason many studies
have indicated Americans to be slightly unhappy when compared to many
of their developed countries’ counterparts despite her sterling economic
might?
Nowhere is the concept of national happiness so ingrained as in the small Asian country of Bhutan.
As far back as 1729, a legal code in this country
stated, “If the Government cannot create happiness for its people, there
is no purpose for that Government to exist.”
But it wasn’t until 1972 when Bhutan’s fourth
Dragon King, Jigme Singye Wangchuck, who opened Bhutan to the age of
modernisation soon after the demise of his father, Jigme Dorji Wangchuk,
coined the term “Gross National Happiness.”
He used this phrase to signal his commitment to
building an economy that would serve Bhutan’s unique culture based on
Buddhist spiritual values.
It was this policy recognition of happiness that
led Bhutan to develop the first well regarded sophisticated survey
instrument to measure the population’s general level of well-being.
No comments :
Post a Comment