An M-Pesa outlet in Nairobi. Airtel had accused Safaricom of pricing
M-Pesa services on unregistered users at double the registered price.
Photo/FILE
Reuters
By GALGALLO FAYO
In Summary
- Airtel’s lawyers say they have made substantial progress towards striking an agreement, indicating that they may have a deal by mid next month.
- The firm had accused Safaricom of pricing M-Pesa services on unregistered users at double the registered price.
- It accused CAK of terminating the matter before the parties were heard or an acceptable settlement filed.
Safaricom,
Airtel and the Competition Authority of Kenya (CAK) have asked for more
time to negotiate an out-of-court settlement in a case where Airtel has
accused its rival of abusing its market dominance in provision of
mobile money transfer services.
Airtel’s lawyers say they have made substantial
progress towards striking an agreement, indicating that they may have a
deal by mid next month.
Airtel moved to the High Court in November
contesting a decision by CAK to terminate a complaint it had filed
asking the competition watchdog to investigate Safaricom for unfairly
pricing M-Pesa services between its subscribers and rival networks.
“There is substantial progress and we ask for a
mention date to crystallise the same. We can come back on June 18,”
lawyers told Justice George Odunga.
Airtel argues that Safaricom has unfairly priced M-Pesa services to cement its dominance in the mobile money transfer business.
It accused CAK of terminating the matter before the parties were heard or an acceptable settlement filed.
Airtel says CAK set a September 18, 2013 date for
hearing of the complaint but this was later pushed to October 29,2013
when the two firms were to present their case and defence.
But, a day before the hearing date, the authority
allegedly terminated the hearing, saying, Safaricom had offered to
settle the matter by directly negotiating with Airtel.
Airtel said the authority did not provide it with the particulars of the settlement offered by Safaricom.
The firm had accused Safaricom of pricing M-Pesa services on unregistered users at double the registered price.
Airtel argued that since M-Pesa is an SMS-based
service, the cost charged should not be more than the Sh2 it costs the
operator to terminate an SMS from a different operator.
The Nairobi bourse-listed telco opposed the
petition arguing it has spent billions of shillings to grow the M-Pesa
agency and would not open its shops to rival operators.
Safaricom’s market share in the mobile money
market stands at 73 per cent in terms of customers — commanding more
than 18 million clients — and 88 per cent in terms of agents, according
to official statistics.
This means that the bulk of the mobile money transactions have been restricted to Safaricom’s network.
No comments :
Post a Comment