PHOTO | SALATON NJAU Parliamentary Budget and Appropriations Committee
chair Rev Mutava Musyimi at Parliament Buildings on March 13, 2014.
NATION MEDIA GROUP
The story on judicial budget
tucked on page 23 of the Sunday Nation (March 30 2014) illustrates how
jaundiced our legislators perceive investment in judicial infrastructure
and services.
Led by the Rev Mutava Musyimi, who
chairs the Budgetary and Appropriations Committee, legislators cited the
high cost of the development expenditure in the Judiciary budget
decrying the wastage involved. Rev Musyimi wondered why the Judiciary is
not getting its own contractors, quality surveyors, engineers and
architects if it has a huge programme of construction.
The
rationale for this huge programme of construction should not be
surprising to anyone, most of all Rev. Musyimi. It was articulated a
while ago in the Judiciary Transformation Framework, 2012-2016.
The
Judiciary aspires to have a High Court in every county, to decentralise
further the Court of Appeal and refurbish old courts. This cost is
one-off and an important investment in easing access to justice for the
Kenyans, and especially the Police.
Early this year, I
conducted a study on mapping insecurity in Kenya for the Kenya Human
Rights Commission and Shield for Justice. The study sites included
police stations. We visited 18 police stations spread across seven
counties.
The study was complemented by other reports including one by Usalama Forum titled ‘Communities and their Police Stations’ that covered 19 other police stations.
One station we covered was Ntimaru police station in Kuria, Migori County.
Here,
I was informed that the closest High Court, where capital offences can
be prosecuted, is in Kisii town. The distance from Ntimaru to Migori
Town, perhaps less than half the distance to Kisii, is simply
prohibitive, running to over 50 kilometres in remote landscape on earth
road.
It was impossible for the investigating officer
to travel in one working day to Kisii and back to attend to capital
offence court matters.
Matters were complicated by the
fact that Ntimaru police station had a police lorry plus one pick-up
vehicle. If both vehicles are engaged, an officer required in court has
to find alternative personal means to court armed with his evidence and
witnesses.
LACK OF JUDICIAL REDRESS
While
the prosecution process can provide transport refund for witnesses, the
same facility is not extended to investigating officers or those
supporting prosecution.
Worse, the security of the
evidence in a case is difficult to guarantee as there is no adequate
infrastructure for keeping, securing and transferring evidence to court.
Police offices are in a debilitating state.
Ntimaru is
not alone in this sorry state of affairs as the Ransely Report
confirmed. The result of this complicated situation is that many
criminal cases are lost, dropped or ignored for lack of access to courts
and infrastructure to sustain the case.
The Budget and
Appropriations Committee must acquaint itself with the many other
police stations that mimic Ntimaru. I would imagine that places like
Baragoi, which we visited, are worse.
Some of these
remote places are also notorious for banditry and violent murders. Not
only is there a connection between incessant crime and lack of judicial
redress, but this situation almost always morphs into a political
problem where those who instigate criminal activities, as we were
repeatedly told in Kuria, embrace impunity, threaten people and dominate
politics knowing they will face no consequences.
Kenyans
will benefit most if the High Courts are close enough. They will
benefit most if dedicated police know that their work will yield justice
for victims.
The Budgetary and Appropriations Committee should of course examine costs and curb wastage, where these are confirmed.
But
unverified reference to the wonder of construction activity at a public
university should not be substitute for good budget thinking.
No comments :
Post a Comment