There is no doubt that devolution, as a concept, is noble. The
idea of taking the government to the roots is inspired, as long as
people are given the opportunity to make important decisions that will
affect their lives.
But what has been happening in the
past month has made many start to wonder whether the outcome will have
been worth all the effort and trouble.
It makes for
depressing reading. Quite possibly, those who drafted the 2010
Constitution could not have envisaged all the confusion and chaos that
would ensue when legislative and executive power was removed from the
centre to the “grassroots”.
Certainly, they could not
have foreseen a situation where the three tiers of government would go
for each other’s jugular, or that supremacy wars would become the order
of the day.
The result is that many people have
started wondering whether they would not have been better off being
ruled by one government despite its imperfections, perfidies, and
depredations. But of course this is a reactionary, if not sacrilegious,
thought.
Perhaps what the Constitution makers did not
take into account was the frailties of human nature, the inanities
brought about by overweening megalomania and voraciousness of the new
rulers, traits that seem to be inevitable components of power.
A
few safeguards would have been necessary to make devolution work.
Unfortunately, we copied the “new” model of governance wholesale from
other countries whose structures have evolved over hundreds of years,
underpinned by greater wealth than ours.
We were in a
hurry to break away from the centralised system of governance in which
the ruling elite “ate” alone and substitute it with a system in which a
new elite gorged themselves from 47 separate troughs.
We did not consider the innate nature of power which has Mammon at its very core.
The
Bible said it succinctly: The love of money is the root of all evil. Do
not be deceived; it is money which is at the root of all the commotion
that has led to confounding wars of attrition between the National
Executive, the National Assembly, the Senate, and the county executives.
USELESS JUNKETS
In
short, the incessant jousting over power between the senators and
governors, MPs and everyone else, is over control of money.
Unfortunately,
these resources are not only limited, very few are talking about
boosting productivity through sensible interventions. Instead, an
overwhelming majority are only concerned about sitting allowances,
bloated perks, and useless junkets abroad.
In a word,
everyone is trying to milk an emaciated cow, but only a few seem to be
seeking ways to feed it so it can produce more milk. This is not
sustainable.
As one newspaper opined earlier in the week, devolution could be on its deathbed unless Kenyans say a thunderous NO!
The
times have been interesting. The Senate has been busy scheming to
emasculate governors with the support of the National Assembly. Earlier,
MPs had been trying to de-ball the Senate by disbanding it altogether
to make it clear they are the Upper House despite the historical
misnomer.
In this, they have received support from
governors who regard the senators as idlers earning for doing nothing.
And then MPs have been vowing to tame the Judiciary whose members, they
believe, have been dishing out court orders and injunctions too
liberally.
In this, the MPs have received the tacit support of the National Executive which accuses the Judiciary of cramping its style.
To
add spice to the whole mess, MPs have again awarded themselves generous
perks to the tune of Sh5 billion, and at the same time punished the
Judiciary by slashing Sh500 million from its budget. It is enough to
make the brain reel.
The one common feature is that all
these institutions seem to be intent only on dipping their fingers into
my pocket and yours through taxes and levies over and above what is
levied by the National Government.
Is it any wonder
that the ordinary Kenyan is beginning to feel like “a room without a
roof”, to paraphrase the immortal lyrics by singer Pharrell Williams?
No comments :
Post a Comment