Energy Secretary Davis Chirchir has
refused to renew the exploration licence of Vanoil Energy Limited on the
grounds that it has no capacity to explore for oil in allocated blocks
in northern Kenya, Sunday Nation has learnt.
Documents seen by Sunday Nation
show that Vanoil, a company whose financiers are registered in the
Cayman Islands, had been allocated oil blocks 3A and 3B in Garissa.
“Taking
into account that Vanoil has not fulfilled minimum work and expenditure
obligations for the initial exploration and that it also does not
possess or has not demonstrated the financial ability required, I shall
not be granting any further term extension for the block 3A and 3B
respectively. The contract shall thus expire automatically,” Mr Chirchir
said in a December 27 letter to Vanoil CEO Samuel Malin.
Mr
Malin did not reply to emailed questions, but his representatives
came to the Sunday Nation asking that the story be delayed until Monday
when Mr Malin would be ready to respond.
“In Kenya,
Vanoil holds a 100 per cent interest in onshore blocks 3A and 3B,
acquired in October 2007 through the signing of a production sharing
contract (PSC) with the government of Kenya,” says a document posted on
Vancouver stock exchange website and signed by Vanoil chairman James
Passin.
Mr Passin further says the company anticipates
‘the receipt of its 10 per cent working interest in the highly
prospective 5,110km sq block L9 alongside Dominion Petroleum Kenya
limited and Far limited. This block lays directly south of Block 8 which
hosts the Mbawa gas discovery made in 2012”.
On its
website, Vanoil describes itself as “a Canadian oil and gas company with
a portfolio of assets in East Africa and in the Republic of
Seychelles.”
CAST DOUBT
Mr Chirchir cast doubt on Vanoil’s exploration ability following an analysis of their financial statement.
“Both
the audited and management accounts provide a clear picture that Vanoil
is in a difficult financial position, and this poses a serious
challenge to the fulfilment of your minimum work and expenditure
obligations,” Mr Chirchir said.
Subsequently, he
wonders whether Vanoil can complete their work on time considering that
they have had four previous extensions in vain.
“Vanoil
signed the two PSC’s for block 3A and 3B on 16th October 2007 and since
then, the duration of the PSC’s has been extended four times for
various reasons as contained in our letter of December 11, 2013. The
initial exploration was to run for three years and expected to come to
an end on January 2011,” says Mr Chirchir.
But on
December 17, 2013, Mr Malin defended Vanoil’s position. He told Mr
Chirchir in a letter that the company had been affected by factors
beyond their control.
No comments :
Post a Comment