PHOTO | FILE Central Organisation of Trade Union secretary General
Francis Atwoli. The NSSF board has defended itself against accusations
that it irregularly allocated Sh5 billion for a city estate housing
project.
NATION MEDIA GROUP
The NSSF board has defended itself
against accusations that it irregularly allocated Sh5 billion for a city
estate housing project.
In a document dated January 8
and signed by acting Managing Trustee Richard Lang’at, the board said
due process was followed in approving the cash, with five of the six
members approving the amount.
The board also said the amount was Sh4,629,168,275.70 and not Sh5.053 billion as alleged by Mr Francis Atwoli.
Cotu
secretary general Francis Atwoli, who is a board member representing
workers, has termed the approval as the “scandal of the year”, demanding
that Tassia II settlement scheme infrastructure development be halted
until further consultations are done.
Cotu affiliates
have backed Mr Atwoli, demanding that the board chairman Adan Mohamed be
sacked or else they would call a nationwide strike and stop
contributing to the national insurer.
But Wednesday, Mr
Lang’at revealed that among all the board members, it was only Mr
Atwoli who neither approved nor objected to the recommendations.
“A
Board of Trustees approval was sought through circulation and five out
of six current members approved the revised cost estimate of Sh5.053
billion inclusive of consultants cost…the sixth board member, Mr Francis
Atwoli neither approved it nor did he object,” he explained
.
.
The approval excluded Sh1.2 billion meant for civil works to the estimated 5,500 individual plots, he added.
Those who approved the project included Mr Lang’at, Mr Mohamed, Mr Ali Noor Ismail, Mr Mutua Kilaka and Ms Jackline Mugo
.
Ms Mugo has, however, distanced herself from the deal.
.
Ms Mugo has, however, distanced herself from the deal.
At
a past press conference, the Cotu boss said no such amount could be
approved by a “mere circulation”, saying it could only be done through a
board meeting. He also claimed he was in London when the email was
circulated.
No comments :
Post a Comment