The majority of wealth funds of the oil-exporting countries of the
Middle East and Asia are stabilisation funds to act as a buffer against
the volatility of oil and gas prices in the international market while
in the African context savings and development is also a key objective.
TEA Graphic
By Christine Mungai The EastAfrican
In Summary
- Question vexing analysts is whether these funds are suitable for the region’s economic, social and demographic profile, considering that the countries in which sovereign wealth funds have been successful have small populations, huge current account surpluses and very low public debt—none of which characterises EA.
- Conflicting political interests are also a problem that governments have to negotiate, particularly in the context of devolving power to sub-national units as has been done in Kenya.
- Still, sovereign wealth funds reflect increasing acceptance of the power of finance by developing countries, giving emerging economies an opportunity to achieve some form of balance between globalisation and national sovereignty
Sovereign wealth funds are fast becoming the “must-have” for any natural resource-exporting country, and for any country hoping to commercialise reserves of oil, gas or minerals in the near future. East Africa has not been left behind, with Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania all considering the establishment of such funds.
But the question vexing analysts is whether these
funds are suitable for the region’s economic, social and demographic
profile, considering that the countries in which sovereign wealth funds
have been successful have small populations, huge current account
surpluses and very low public debt—none of which characterises East
Africa.
According to some estimates, the total wealth held
by such funds globally is more than $5 trillion, expected to grow
quickly as more and more countries move to set up their own national
funds.
Originally created in the 1950s by oil and
resource-producing countries to help stabilise their economies against
fluctuating commodity prices, and to provide a source of wealth for
future generations, they have proliferated considerably in recent years.
Since 2005, 32 sovereign wealth funds have been
created around the world; about 60 per cent are financed by proceeds
from oil and gas while the rest are based on non-commodity sources, such
as from the manufacturing sector.
Last month, Tanzania enacted the Natural Gas
Policy of 2013, which provides for the establishment of a sovereign
wealth fund, a state-owned investment vehicle where proceeds from its
vast reserves of natural gas will be channelled to finance social and
economic development; and generate wealth for future generations.
The creation of a similar fund in Kenya was part
of President Uhuru Kenyatta’s Jubilee campaign manifesto. In October, a
taskforce on parastatal reforms set up by the President proposed the
establishment of the Kenya Sovereign Wealth Fund.
It is intended to support local communities with
the proceeds of oil, gas and mining, support government savings and act
as a stabilisation fund to cushion the economy from the abrupt inflow of
foreign exchange, which could destabilise monetary policy, making
exports more expensive and thus negatively affect other sectors of the
economy such as agriculture.
“A sovereign wealth fund is a good idea. Kenya has
had a problem with high domestic borrowing which crowds out the private
sector and pushes up interest rates. Government can borrow from the
fund and reduce competition for credit,” says Dr Moses Ikiara, managing
director of the Kenya Investment Authority (KenInvest). “It will also
allow us to do long term investments in infrastructure and energy.”
Uganda and Mozambique, too, are mulling the
setting up of such funds, anticipating the windfall that will come with
the commercialisation of oil and gas in the next five to 10 years.
Rwanda already has a sovereign wealth fund in the
form of the Agaciro Development Fund, which was set up to support the
government development budget following an abrupt cut in donor aid in
August 2012.
Valued at $41 million as of June 2013, Agaciro is
however not funded by the proceeds of natural resources but rather is
financed by voluntary contributions from Rwandan citizens at home and
abroad, as well as “private companies and friends of Rwanda”, according
to official government statements.
No comments :
Post a Comment