By John Gachiri
Comprehensive reforms undertaken in 2005
envisaged strong regional water provision companies that would reduce
wastage, collect revenue and plough back the proceeds into modernisation
and expansion of the existing network.
This has not materialised and the only visible
progress is on communities partnering with financiers on alternative
sources like dams to ensure reliable supply, albeit at higher costs.
Few of the public companies have invested in the
systems they found as earnings go into paying salaries and cosmetic
changes like online interactions, electronic and agency payments.
The infrastructure has not been improved to reduce
spillage, ensure continuous supply and expand access in both rural and
urban areas.
The Water Services Regulatory Board is now
proposing that the 102 firms be merged into 15 units because they cannot
survive as commercial entities.
That would bring the financially weak ones under
stable ones, spreading the malaise and threatens the very survival of
all water companies.
Larger units would probably be more problematic given that only seven have their heads above water.
The struggling companies should instead be
encouraged to review wages and other costs while investing in systems to
ensure that less water is lost, more revenue collected and supply
reaches more people.
With local banks increasingly looking to finance water projects, this would be more promising path to viability.
No comments :
Post a Comment