Traditional
African society venerated age and elders were held in high esteem. They
were seen as the repositories of communal wisdom and knowledge.
Indeed,
the Council of Elders was the supreme legislative, judicial and
executive authority in practically all African communities and their
decisions were final and binding. Being designated an elder was the
highest honour one could achieve. But that was then.
If
the cacophonous din, especially from the digital generation, caused by
the recent parastatal appointments is anything to go by, then I fear for
the elderly office-holders.
One gets the feeling that
it is almost morally reprehensible for these ‘dinosaurs’ to even be
seen hovering around the corridors of power as though they are angling
for appointment to public office.
There seems to be the
mistaken belief (yes, mistaken) that the elders have nothing more to
contribute, that they should just idle away their remaining days
regaling their grandchildren with tales of their past glory, or better
still, writing their memoirs.
But our national
dialogue, if one can call it that, should be focused on the ability to
deliver rather than the age factor. Many world leaders such as Mandela
who began his presidency in his 80s did a sterling job. Jomo Kenyatta
began his in his 70s and Kenya did prosper under him.
This
is the same absurd logic that informs the calls for Raila’s retirement
from active politics, yet age has not rendered him less of a reformist!
Most
board chairmen in the private sector are actually in this category. The
digital generation must be disabused of the belief that they have a
monopoly on knowledge!
The Lapsset project, for
instance, was conceived by President Kibaki with his fellow
octogenarians — I suppose Mr Francis Muthaura was among them.
The
tough traffic rules that brought some semblance of sanity to the matatu
industry were introduced by John Michuki in 2004 at the age of 72,
before he passed on at 80 in 2012. (Show me anyone in the digital
generation to match him!)
Besides, the appointments are
for chairpersons which — I stand to be corrected — are non-executive.
One hopes the CEOs, who are the ones who actually run these parastatals,
will be younger and reflect regional balance among other concerns.
There
is a sense of entitlement among a section of Jubilee supporters, and
therein lies the problem. That candidates of their choice were not
appointed is the cause of the howls of protest and outrage.
Patronage
the world over is a reality in politics. Jubilee may have boxed itself
into a corner with its promises of generational change, but the
President and his deputy must contend with realpolitik; they must reward
even those election losers and retirees because they stood by them in
their hour of need.
I suspect they will be much more
alive to the criticisms directed at them in their next round of
appointments. It would, however, be naïve to expect them to revoke the
ones they have already made.
Mr Muthuma is an editor with Focus Publishers (hilgits@gmail.com)
No comments :
Post a Comment