Miraa farmer, Ms Jennifer Kathure, picks some miraa leaves in her farm
in Laare area of Igembe North on October 9, 2013. British MPs have asked
their Government to reverse its ban on miraa imports. PHOTO | FILE
British MPs have asked their Government to reverse its ban on miraa imports.
They
said the ban was likely to hurt already marginalised groups and
disputed the claim of a link between miraa users and criminal activities
in the UK.
“Consumption of khat is confined to
specific communities from Somalia, Ethiopia, Yemen and Kenya. Enforcing
the ban will involve policing an activity that is carried out by a very
small proportion of the population all who belong to two or three
diaspora communities,” said the House of Common’s Home Affairs
Committee, in a report which suggests there is too much ado about
nothing in the proposed ban by Home Secretary Theresa May.
The
16-member committee chaired by Labour Party’s Leicester East member
Keith Vaz says the ban would create a flourishing black market which
would raise prices that could in turn breed organised crime.
The
report, which is yet to be debated in the House of Commons, says the
ban would lead to more public funds being used to enforce the law than
to address the social and medical harms of chewing khat.
It
says the ban could deny the £ 2.5 million pounds (Ksh 360 million) in
tax revenues. The committee acknowledged that potential loss of jobs in
Meru could lead to more youth joining the dreaded Al-Shabaab militia.
The
report seems to have adopted a critical presentation by the Adhoc
Committee on miraa of the Kenyan Parliament chaired by Meru Women
Representative Florence Kajuju, whose team met the UK committee on
November 19 last year and asked the British government to rescind the
decision.
On Friday, Ms Kajuju welcomed the verdict of the UK Parliament.
“It
is a positive feedback. We had a candid interaction with our
counterparts and they seemed to understand that the ban is not as simple
as Ms May had thought,” said Ms Kajuju.
No comments :
Post a Comment