Sugarcane being transported to the factory in Mumias. FILE
Kenyan sugar miller Mumias Sugar Company
has received a Sh481 million ($5.6 million) soft loan from the
government to repair its eroded cash position.
The
two-year loan from the Kenya Sugar Board comes after the company
recorded its lowest sugar production ever in five years due to cane
poaching by rival mills, falling cane quality and decreasing acreage in
its key catchment area of western Kenya.
The poor cane
delivery and dwindling sugar production have seen the company’s revenue
drop and affected its ability to pay creditors.
In the
financial year ended June 2013, the company struggled to service an
$18.5 million loan from Proparco, a development financial institution
partly owned by Agence Française de Développement.
The
cash flow challenge has pushed the company into sourcing for short-term
borrowing to bolster its liquidity. In the year ended June, the company
had an outstanding overdraft of Ksh1 billion ($11 million) and took a
new loan of Ksh1.15 billion ($13 million) from KCB.
The
poor cash flow saw the company suspend dividend payment for the first
time in five years since 2009. Earnings per share for 2012 were Ksh1.31
(1 US cent) and Ksh1.26 (1 US cent) in 2011.
The
increasing subdivision of cane farms has reduced productivity in main
cane growing region of western Kenya, a factor that, coupled with the
entry of new sugar millers, has triggered off cane poaching.
“An
estimated 150,000 tonnes of cane was poached by neighbouring mills
especially in western Kenya… this has become a challenge to our
operations affecting cane supply and distorting projections,” said
managing director Peter Kebati.
The country’s largest
miller produced 147, 308 tonnes of sugar in the 2012/2013 financial
year, which was 41 per cent below the targeted 250,000 tonnes, a 15 per
cent decrease from the previous year’s production of 173,600 tonnes.
Analysts
say with the country largely dependant on small scale farmers who
depend on rainfall, there is no likelihood of an increase in cane
production in western Kenya.
According to the World
Bank, with the exception of Mumias Sugar — with a capacity utilisation
rate of 70 per cent — the other sugar companies in western Kenya have an
average utilisation rate of 55 per cent, making their output expensive
since they have to spread the fixed costs to the low production levels.
The
global lender estimates that it costs $550 to produce a tonne of sugar
in Kenya compared with $230-$550 tonnes in other Comesa member states.
The
World Bank said things will get tougher for local millers once Comesa
safe guards that limit the entry of duty free sugar into the country
expire in February next year.
“Without protection,
most of the producers in western Kenya will find it difficult to dispose
of their sugar in the local market, unless measures are taken to
improve production and processing efficiency.”
The
Kenyan sugar industry has struggled to become competitive, weighed down
by a myriad challenges including high cost of production.
The
sector has survived courtesy of protection from imports from the Comesa
markets — considered low-cost producers. The safeguards that have
existed since 2003 will expire in February 2014.
According
to a World Bank report on “Achieving Shared Prosperity in Kenya,” the
local sugar industry remains under global threat since the protectionist
measures have not been complemented by efforts to streamline it.
The
measures, said the report, have turned Kenya into a high cost sugar
producer, making the country the most attractive open market for sugar
after the EU.
Apart from Mumias, which controls about
60 per cent of the market, all the other seven major millers operate
below 55 per cent of crushing capacity. Mumias achieves 70 per cent.
But
poor cane supply and quality has seen the firm’s sugar recovery rate
steadily tumble from 10.7 per cent in 2009 to 8.4 per cent in 2013,
directly affecting sugar output.
Despite the increase
in the number of millers and consumption growing at an annual average of
4 per cent according to the World Bank, output has stagnated.
No comments :
Post a Comment