President Uhuru Kenyatta’s trial at the ICC has been pushed to February 5, 2014.
This comes a day after the prosecution declined to oppose the postponement from November 12.
It
also comes in the wake of a spirited diplomatic offensive by the
government and the African Union at the UN Security Council to have the
cases against President Kenyatta and his deputy William Ruto deferred.
President
Kenyatta had applied that his trial be postponed to at least February
12, 2014 while the prosecution wanted the postponement not go beyond
February 3, 2014.
PARTIES IN AGREEMENT
“The
Chamber notes that the parties are in agreement on postponing the trial
date until February 2014 in order to give the prosecution additional
time to investigate recent factual allegations raised by the defence,”
the ICC judges said.
The defence of President Kenyatta
wanted the start date of his trial postponed for the chamber to deal
with the issues of abuse of process that it raised on the October 10 to
have the charges dropped.
Chief prosecutor Fatou
Bensouda, said she was not opposed to most of the reasons but said the
trial date should not go beyond February 3, 2014.
“The
new date should be fixed as Monday 3, February 2014,” she said. This was
in relation to the decision by the judges allowing her to include two
additional witnesses, one of them a Mungiki insider.
However,
the judges ruled that all prosecution witnesses linked to the outlawed
sect should only testify after the end of January next year.
Thursday,
Ms Bensouda submitted that the ruling interrupted her plans since she
would not be able to present witnesses whose evidence is at the core of
the charges against President Kenyatta.
The prosecutor argued that it
Ms
Bensouda said she wanted to prosecute the case against President
Kenyatta in a systematic way, starting with witnesses whose evidence is
at the heart of the case.
The prosecution did not
oppose the postponement because they needed more time “to present
evidence in a ‘logical and coherent’ sequence”.
However,
the victims’ lawyer was opposed to the postponement. “A delay in the
conduct of these proceedings is an issue of deep concern to the victims,
and many victims have repeatedly and forcefully communicated to the
legal representative their total opposition to any further delay,” said
lawyer Fergal Gaynor.
No comments :
Post a Comment