Establishing the worth and strength of a family business
By PETER MUTUA
Posted Monday, November 4 2013 at 18:00
Posted Monday, November 4 2013 at 18:00
In Summary
- When family feuds rocked Tuskys and Naivas supermarkets in 2012 and 2013 respectively, attention was glued on the combatants embroiled in what promised to be a long drawn-out battle
- Many family businesses dream that they will, one day, become regular suppliers to large corporate customers
- Family businesses are prone to deception by temporary success, especially when this arises from a partnership with dominant market players whose expansion automatically leads to enterprise growth
When family feuds rocked Tuskys and Naivas
supermarkets in 2012 and 2013 respectively, attention was glued on the
combatants embroiled in what promised to be a long drawn-out battle.
What was hidden from public view was the fate of
hundreds of suppliers to these giant retailers whose livelihoods were at
stake; individuals and organisations that were completely dependent on
the supermarkets for their survival. For these, it was a huge relief
when the families decided to take their disagreements off air.
Many family businesses dream that they will, one day, become regular suppliers to large corporate customers.
They blissfully imagine that being accredited to
supply goods to these giants will unlock opportunities to expand their
market share within Kenya and beyond, allowing them to concentrate on
producing goods for guaranteed markets. Once a chosen few get their feet
in the door, they bend over backwards to fulfil all the principals
desires. This can have disastrous results.
When Wal-Mart made the commitment to deliver
“Always low prices. Always.” no one imagined the length to which they
would go to ensure that they always has the lowest prices in the market.
By consistently building efficiencies into their systems and demanding
that their suppliers do the same, Wal-Mart eventually arrived at the
point where they began rolling back prices of popular goods.
As customers celebrated increasingly affordable
consumer goods, suppliers were left to bear the costs. While some
flourished, others for whom Wal-Mart was the biggest customer ultimately
got to the place where they could not lower prices any more and were
forced out of business.
Others like Jack Wier of lawn mower manufacturer
Snapper viewed the low price trend as a business threat. Looking into
the future, Mr Wier realised that a low price-high-volume approach was
not compatible to Snappers strategy of building high end, high spec
machines.
During a visit to Wal-Mart’s headquarters in
Bentonville Arkansas, Mr Wier did what very few vendors would dare; he
politely turned down a contract to supply Wal-Mart, instantly cutting
off 20 per cent of his business.
While the Snapper brand suffered a temporary
setback, their strategy of remaining at the high end eventually paid
off. Mr Wier gained the confidence and respect of his staff and
distributors who also saw Wal-Mart as a threat; his stance got them even
more committed to Snapper.
Mr Wier recognised that the high end product,
distribution chain and pride associated with being an American
manufacturer had an intrinsic though unquantified value worth far more
than toiling every year to supply orders that promised only diminishing
profits and possible subsequent collapse of the venture. This knowledge
gave him the confidence to stand up to the biggest corporation in the
world.
It is important for the leader of family business
to have a clear idea of the venture’s is worth, what they could realise
from its sale in various circumstances and what internal or external
factors could enhance or diminish the business’ value.
Having this information allows that the leader to
make prudent decisions, carry themselves with the bearing appropriate
for the business’ stature and properly motivate their team members.
Family businesses are prone to deception by
temporary success, especially when this arises from a partnership with
dominant market players whose expansion automatically leads to
enterprise growth. While fruits of increased market share and growth can
initially be sweet, they could turn poisonous if the partner
organisation succeeds spectacularly— leading to unreasonable demands or
fails on account of internal wrangles.
Mutua is a Humphrey Fellow and a family business consultant
No comments :
Post a Comment