EDITOR: The
liberalization of the retirement benefits sector, or if you want, the
pension fund, was largely informed by and moulded on the Chilean model.
In May 1981, Chile took on what the world then saw as a ballsy move,
moreover by a socialist country.
The privatisation of social security. The contribution system was to
be managed solely by private management pension funds. This model grew
rapidly and by February 2005 private pension funds controlled $61b, at
the time, more than 55% of Chile’s GDP!
Privatisation of this fund came with its own problems like high
operational costs which led to high management fees, discrimination
against the poor, misleading rates of return informed by currency
speculation, etc. All those issues are likely to affect the Ugandan
worker once the pension sector is liberalised.
This expectation of phenomenal profits as is the case with Chile
seems to be the reason many governments are fashioning and pushing for
privatisation of pension schemes. In Chile, government officials,
international agencies and academics are rushing to address the
system’s many failures to avert a possible crisis.
And so why is it that even as this is happening, in Uganda, we are
still pushing for the pension scheme privatisation continuously citing
and glorifying the Chilean success story but ignoring these shortcomings
that will no doubt come to haunt us or our children, our children’s
children years from now? Who is looking out for the poor man in all of
this?
Raffik Kumar
No comments :
Post a Comment