Good governance is of crucial importance
if the existing pension funds are to overcome the challenges such as the
existing pre mature withdrawals of pension contributions
being faced. The pension fund situation in Tanzania, has worsened in the last
few years due to the effects of the global financial crisis.
Public pension funds are established by
various Acts passed by law makers who are members of Parliament of United
Republic of Tanzania (URT) and asserted by President of URT Public pension
funds are financed by both employer and employee facilitate and organize the
investment of employees' retirement funds contributed by the employer and
employees. The public pension fund is a common asset pool meant to generate
stable growth over the long term, and provide pensions for employees when they
reach the end of their working years and commence retirement.
Among the most impactful effects have
been the increase rate of premature pension contribution withdrawals and
therefore as a result of decline in contributions by pensioners and as a direct
result of unstable employment and lower real wage growth. Essentially, more
persons have been withdrawing their pension contributions and at the same time
are earning the same or less, which in deed affect their ability to contribute
to pension funds. This is further compounded by high levels of unemployment and
a shift from formal to informal activities, as more persons attempted to
conduct side small and medium businesses to either supplement their income or
replace that which they had lost in the hostile job market.
To combat these factors, that have been
debilitating to an area this should be referred to as the channel for
retirement which links households, financial institutions, the government and
the world, the only way out here is the good governance within public pension
organisations to be seen as the solution. Good governance should be in the
context of public pension funds' success being of importance to both the
clients and the broader economy.
Within good governance, focus should be
given to the covering all aspects of this concept including financial policy
and regulatory framework. Transparency improves governance and inspires
confidence in the product and company alike. To achieve this, the consistent
review of policies which guide pension funds is important, as is the public
dissemination of accounts and quality reports.
Country wide, there
are several challenges that pension funds face and which must be dealt with if
they are to return to pre-crisis levels of achievement. These challenges are an
aging population, lack of diversification in investments, inadequacy of funds
and the inability to predict contributions and benefits by pensioners. The
number of premature withdraws have tremendously increased due to the prevailing
socio-economic factors.
Lack of aggressive
efforts on public education to educate members to retain their
contributions once the employment ceases so as to benefit from the pensions
offered by the Fund. Non performance of the loan portfolio due to the non
complying borrowers and the prolonged legal action procedures once the
defaulters are taken to court. The existing of unfair competition in the
process of registration of new members whereby some social security funds use
unethical means to induce registration of members. And tax on Fund’s income
which is said to reduce the financial capacity to pay meaningful benefits to
members.
There is a need in collaboration with
social security regulatory authority (SSRA) to come out with deliberately
achievable targets to bring back the hope for the existing public pension funds
and the investment market as reforms, though difficult, are very possible.
These reforms must tackle governance, regulations and the sustainability of
pension funds.
For governance, public pension funds
should assess the performance persons managing pensions’ funds, conduct regular
reviews of employee compensation mechanisms, identify, monitor an correct
conflicts of interests, implement adequate risk measurement and management
system and be proactive in dealing with the major risks facing funds.
Consideration should be given to
regulations, excessive reliance on current market values when determining
pension contributions should also be avoided, limiting contribution holidays
and excessive waiver of pension contributions, stability of long-term
contribution patterns and incorporating flexibility into funding should
strongly be encouraged.
Achieving sustainability can be done
through by the generation of adequate returns to meet business daily
obligations, improving efficiency in public pension products and service
delivery, increasing capacity through enhanced training opportunities and
building credibility and expertise.
The responsibility of standard setting
should not remain solely with the newly established Social Security Regulator
Authority (SSRA). The existing public pension schemes such as Parastatal
Pensions Fund (PPF), National Social Security Fund (NSSF), Local Government
Pensions Fund (LAPF), Public Service Pension Fund (PSPF), national health
insurance fund (NHIF), and Government Employees Provident Fund (GEPF) should
continually attempt to improve governance beyond what is stipulated and try to
surpass even industry best practices, as regulation is too often reactive in a
business that requires one to successfully act proactively in a fast-paced and
stochastic environment.