THE government will continue using the Attorney General (AG) to review all contracts entered by different agencies for the interests of the nation, the Prime Minister, Mr Kassim Majaliwa, told the National Assembly here.
He discouraged a proposal by a section
of Members of Parliament (MPs) that all contracts the country was
signing with different investors should be brought before the House for
review before implementation.
“I do not think this is a good idea.
Fine, it may be so for some of contracts at certain levels. But bringing
all contracts for review will render the Parliament with no other
business to do. We must trust the Attorney General,” the Prime Minister
said.
He was responding to some questions by
Ms Kunti Majala (Special Seat- Chadema), who had pointed, among others,
that some of contracts the country was entering had corruption elements
and was costing the nation.
The MP claimed that according to the
Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania, Parliament was charged
with duties of supervising the government in its operations, including
when entering contracts through its agencies.
She, therefore, sought to know when the
government would present before the National Assembly the contracts
entered for review and see whether they were beneficial for the nation.
In his response, the prime minister
acknowledged that indeed the government had been entering different
contracts with investors and other parties through its agencies. But, he
said, the procedure in place shows that the AG had been representing
the government in all such transactions in order to review all the
contracts before being signed.
“The Attorney General is among executive
officers, charged with advising the government and he is recognized
constitutionally. If he (AG) is satisfied, he may allow the government
agency concerned to sign the contract for the government,” the premier
explained.
Regarding corruption elements on
contracts entered, Mr Majaliwa stated that there were laid down
procedures, including taking legal measures against government officials
proved to have acted unreasonably to sign the contract in question.
There have been several complaints among
MPs on the way some contracts entered by certain government agencies
were costing the nation, notably contracts relating to energy and
minerals, tourism, manufacturing and transport sectors.
They prefer such contracts to be forwarded to the National Assembly before being signed by the involved parties.
In his report presented before the
National Assembly here recently, the Controller and Auditor General
(CAG) revealed inadequacies in procurement and contract management which
cost the government more than 57bn/- in the 2014/15 financial year.
The significant procurement issues in
the last financial year’s report include among others, a list of
entities that made procurement outside the annual procurement plan
(8.5bn/-) and entities that made procurement without approval of the
Tender Board (494.4m/-).
Others, according to the report, are
procurement made without competitive tendering (27.1bn/-), delivered
goods without inspection (15.5bn/-) and procurement of goods and
services without contracts (5.2bn/-).
Also in the list is procurement of goods
and services through imprests (150.3m/-), procurement of goods and
services from unapproved suppliers (8.6m/-) as well as goods and works
procured and paid for but not delivered (3.3m/-).
No comments :
Post a Comment