The price of
Tanzania's onions imported by Kenyan traders keep shifting. It increased
from Sh108 per
kilo in February this year to Sh118 in April due to
logistical challenges posed by coronavirus testing at the Kenya-Tanzania
borders.
When President
Kenyatta ordered the closure of the border except for cargo vehicles in
May, and Tanzania retaliated by banning all cargo trucks, the price shot
up to Sh150.
The volatile onion prices mirror the erratic relations between the two countries.
The challenges
faced by onion traders are also representative of the woes businesses
have to grapple with whenever there is a misunderstanding between the
two countries, whose sibling rivalry is always never far from the
surface.
ESCALATED DISPUTE
The question then
is how does the trade between the countries look like? Who stands to
lose more in case of an escalated dispute?
Tanzania has a
nearly balanced trade with Kenya, importing goods worth Sh23.3 billion
in 2017, while exporting goods worth 23.7 billion.
However, trade
between the two countries has been on a downward trend since 2014 when
Kenyan exports to Tanzania stood at Sh64.7 billion and in 2015 when
imports from Tanzania peaked at Sh79.4 billion.
This decline tells
of simmering differences and political grandstanding between the
administrations in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam that has resulted in cold
war policies that have made it difficult to do business across East
Africa's big economies.
DOWN MEMORY LANE
The uneasy ties
between Nairobi and Dar did not start yesterday. It goes back to when
the two countries had just attained independence from the colonialists.
It was the closure
of borders between Tanzania and Kenya in 1977 that finally killed the
decade-old East Africa Community. The threats of border closures,
seizing goods and discrimination have continued to date.
When EAC was
revived in 2000 trade slowly began to pick up between the two countries.
Kenya's annual exports grew from Sh10.7 billion in 2002 to Sh64.7
billion in 2014 while imports grew from Sh3.5 billion to Sh79.4 billion
in 2015.
However, with new administrations in Nairobi in 2013 and in Dar es Salaam in 2015, trade plunged to a decade low.
Kenya's
isolationist policy of courting Rwanda and Uganda to the Standard Gauge
Railway through "the coalition of the willing" was viewed as a
geopolitical move against Tanzania.
However, as the
coalition of the willing collapsed, Tanzania scored its own geopolitical
wins by convincing Kigali to link with Dar's SGR and Kampala to route
the East Africa Crude Oil Pipeline through the country.
Tanzania also
differed over the Economic Partnership Agreement that almost blocked
Kenya from the European market and was only allowed access under special
arrangements with EU countries.
DIPLOMATIC ROW
Traders from both
countries have raised issues including lack of preferential treatment on
Kenyan textiles, edible oil, cement and lubricants with growing
administrative barriers that have cropped up to slow bilateral trade.
Relations also
soured when Kenyan milk products were greatly affected by the trade wars
that saw the value of export to Tanzania drop by 79 per cent between
2014 and 2016.
In 2017, Kenyan millers strongly opposed the government's move to allow Tanzanian firms to bring in wheat flour duty-free.
It was only in 2018
during the summit of EAC heads of State that President Kenyatta and
President John Magufuli acknowledged the gravity of the problems and
agreed to resolve them through their respective ministries.
But the frosty
relations resurfaced when Kenya's Starehe Member of Parliament Charles
Njagua made xenophobic statements against Ugandans and Tanzanians doing
business in Nairobi threatening to storm their businesses. This sparked a
diplomatic row.
CORDIAL RELATIONSHIPS
The see-sawing
relations then seemed to thaw with President Kenyatta's private visit to
Chato, the home of Tanzania's president John Magufuli in July last
year.
It was thought that
with the two heads of State cultivating personal cordial relationships,
the bilateral ties would be recalibrated in a way that small disputes
would not arise and muddy trade between the two countries.
However the latest
tiff over coronavirus means that the uneasy relations between the two
countries persist, with same old issues still simmering beneath the
veneer of calm and display of brotherliness.
Mr Sallu Johnson, a
regional expert on customs and logistics, told Smart Company that
politics tends to get in the way of bilateral ties, with businesses
bearing the brunt of any diplomatic tiff.
He said that
although there are agreements among, for instance, the buyers, sellers
and transporters of onions, which specify who bears liability for the
goods in transit, the contract does not deal with such an occurrence as
the border closure.
LOGISTICAL NIGHTMARE
"Borders are meant
to be transit points, not interchange terminals. A political order that
goods should be offloaded and changed creates a logistical nightmare,"
Mr Johnson said.
"As a transporter
ferrying the onions, you're aware that it starts deteriorating as soon
as it leaves the farm and any further delay reduces the quality, and you
may end up selling them in Mombasa at a throw-away price so you do not
incur a huge loss," he said.
The Kenya
Association of Manufacturers (KAM) says the current row, which appeared
to have been resolved following the Kenyatta-Magufuli intervention, is
only a tip of the iceberg.
Long standing
issues, especially Tanzania's continuous increase of internal taxes as
measures to protect their own industries, have stifled investments and
market access for locally manufactured products.
"Tanzania has
continued to increase taxes on Kenyan products. Whilst this is aimed at
protecting Tanzania's industries, the measures are discriminative, and
[this] goes against the EAC Customs protocols," KAM chief executive
Phyllis Wakiaga said.
KAM said that
Tanzania has imposed excise duty (80 per cent higher) on Kenyan
cigarettes despite tobacco raw material being fully sourced from Kenya
since 2005.
EAC LAWS
"The non-tariff
barriers (NTB) on cigarettes presents a significant excise/pricing
disadvantage. This is contradictory to Article 15 (National Treatment)
of Protocol on Establishment of the EAC Customs Union, which is
categorically against discrimination on the same or like products of
other Partner States.
"In addition,
Article 8 of the Treaty Establishing the East Africa Community provides
that, the EAC laws take precedence over similar national laws on matters
pertaining to the implementation of the treaty," Ms Wakiaga points out.
Through Animal
Diseases (Animal and Animal Products Movement Control) amendment,
Tanzania has also imposed import and export fees on beef and beef
products.
This has increased
levies to Tsh4,800 per kilo of meat (from Ksh200 to Kh500) and Tsh1,800
per kilo for milk against the spirit of the EAC where Tanzania (a
partner State) is required to accord equal treatment to products from
Kenya.
Subsequently, this has negatively affected Kenya beef and beef products into Tanzania.
Tanzania Revenue
Authority (TRA) has not been issuing assessment for confectionery until
Atomic Energy Certificate is attached in the TRA system.
This implies that
samples have to be provided by an agent/client to the Tanzania Bureau of
Standards in Arusha and a fee of 0.4 per cent of invoice value paid.
A new requirement
from the Government Chemists and Lab Allied (GLCA) is that all
transporters of chemicals must have this licence to transport chemicals
into Tanzania that cost approximately $2 per metric tonnes.
Tanzania is also
subjecting 1 per cent of the invoice value of transfer of roasted coffee
products from Kenya into Tanzania. This is mainly done by the Tanzania
Coffee Board, which increases the cost of the Kenyan product in
Tanzania.
But while Nairobi
blames Dar for most of the anti-trade practices, in some cases Kenyan
companies have not helped in creating confidence.
Closures of
Nakumatt and Uchumi supermarkets without paying Tanzanian suppliers has
been raised in diplomatic round tables as some of the issues derailing
relations.
No comments :
Post a Comment