Regional leaders will hold a special summit on South Sudan in
Nairobi mid-September to address sticky issues in the peace process.
Diplomatic
sources in Khartoum said Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir — who is the
guarantor of the last phase of the talks — has assured opposition
leader Dr Riek Machar that he would table his concerns at the summit for
a collective decision.
President al-Bashir met Dr
Machar in Khartoum on Wednesday, a day after the rebel leader raised
objections to the peace deal, saying some of the proposals by his
Sudanese People’s Liberation Movement-In Opposing (SPLM-IO) were
ignored. However, he signed the deal on Thursday.
But
another headache ahead is whether President al-Bashir can persuade other
Inter-Governmental Authority on Development (Igad) leaders to include
demands by Dr Machar and other opposition groups that have singled out
what they call “bracketed areas.”
“President al-Bashir
did not want to be seen as imposing an agreement on the South Sudanese.
He would rather the regional leaders consider the concerns raised by the
opposition,” said James Oryema, the SPLM-IO representative in Kenya.
Once
the Igad summit resolves the outstanding issues in Nairobi, the
mediators will retreat to Addis Ababa where they will harmonise the new
features of the agreement with the 2015 peace deal, before the final
signing.
SPLM-IO, together with the South Sudan Opposition Alliance
(SSOA) had suggested that the permanent constitution-making should be
undertaken by a new National Constitutional Assembly involving other
parties and not the current National Constitutional Review Commission
that was single handily constituted by President Salva Kiir.
However,
the mediators led by Sudanese Foreign Affairs Minister Al-Dirdiri
Mohamed Ahmed, said the Khartoum Round of Talks had no mandate to tackle
the constitutional-making process.
Both SPLM-IO and
the SSOA, which comprises nine armed and non-armed groups, also want the
decision-making organ in the Cabinet, the Council of Ministers in which
President Kiir enjoys a majority, to be changed to collegial instead of
majority votes.
“The decision-making process, means
the government is able to amend the agreement at will. The regime only
needs the vote of four VPs to change the agreement and they already have
three. This means the status quo will dominate the transition and the
agreement will be dismantled,” said Mabior Garang de Mabior, the rebel
group’s chairperson for information and public relations.
The
opposition has also rejected the 32 states created by President Kiir,
and demanded that the country revert to the initial 10 states.
The
Igad mediators had the proposed a referendum led by Independent
Boundaries Commission for South Sudanese to choose between the 32 and 10
states, or any alternative that may come up.
However,
the former detainees, commonly known as the FDs, have rejected the last
chapter on the grounds that their chief mediator, former foreign
minister Deng Alor, signed the chapter prematurely before the groups
completed their consultations.
The FDs leader, Pagan
Amum, who is also the SPLM secretary-general, said the final chapter has
left many issues unresolved, and does not create the necessary
conditions for a sustainable peace in South Sudan.
He
maintained that the outstanding issues that they had raised earlier need
to be resolved satisfactorily and reflected in the final text of the
draft agreement before initialising.
“At this eleventh
hour, we can no longer rely on vague assurances of signing documents
with reservations or having points of disagreements bracketed or
referred to other bodies for decision,” he said.
Former assistant minister of foreign affairs and a member of the FDs, Dr Cirino Hiteng, told The EastAfrican that Mr Alor, and Transport Minister John Luke Jok, have virtually defected and are working with the government.
“Most
of the FD members have agonised for quite some time over their
inability to comply with the majority decisions. However, they will
continue to maintain the two FDs positions as part of the government
because they practically abandoned the reform agenda,” said Dr Cirino.
No comments :
Post a Comment