Poor
quality health services are holding back progress on improving health
in countries at all income levels, according to a new joint report by
the World Health Organisation (WHO), Organisation for Economic
Co-operation and Development (OECD), and the World Bank Group.
According to the report, presently,
inaccurate diagnosis, medication errors, inappropriate or unnecessary
treatment, inadequate or unsafe clinical facilities or practices, or
providers who lack adequate training and expertise prevail in all
countries.
The situation is worst in low and
middle-income countries where 10 percent of hospitalised patients can
expect to acquire an infection during their stay, as compared to seven
percent in high income countries. This is despite hospital acquired
infections being easily avoided through better hygiene, improved
infection control practices and appropriate use of antimicrobials. At
the same time, one in ten patients is harmed during medical treatment in
high income countries.
These were just some of the highlights
from the report titled, ‘Delivering Quality Health Services – a Global
Imperative for Universal Health Coverage.’
The report also highlighted that
sickness associated with poor quality health care imposes additional
expenditure on families and health systems.
There has been some progress in
improving quality, for example in survival rates for cancer and
cardiovascular disease. Even so, the broader economic and social costs
of poor quality care, including long-term disability, impairment and
lost productivity, are estimated to amount to trillions of dollars each
year.
“Good health is the foundation of a
country’s human capital, and no country can afford low-quality or unsafe
healthcare,” World Bank Group President Jim Yong Kim said.
“Low-quality care disproportionately
impacts the poor, which is not only morally reprehensible, it is
economically unsustainable for families and entire countries.”
“At WHO we are committed to ensuring
that people everywhere can obtain health services when and where they
need them,” WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.
“We are equally committed to ensuring
that those services are good quality. Quite honestly, there can be no
universal health coverage without quality care.”
“Without quality health services,
universal health coverage will remain an empty promise,” said OECD
Secretary-General Ángel Gurría. “The economic and social benefits are
clear and we need to see a much stronger focus on investing in and
improving quality to create trust in health services and give everyone
access to high-quality, people-centred health services.”
Other key findings in the report painted a picture of quality issues in healthcare around the world.
Part of it stated that, “health care workers in seven low- and middle-income African countries were only able to make accurate diagnoses one third to three quarters of the time, and clinical guidelines for common conditions were followed less than 45 percent of the time on average.
Part of it stated that, “health care workers in seven low- and middle-income African countries were only able to make accurate diagnoses one third to three quarters of the time, and clinical guidelines for common conditions were followed less than 45 percent of the time on average.
“Research in eight high-mortality
countries in the Caribbean and Africa found that effective, quality
maternal and child health services are far less prevalent than suggested
by just looking at access to services. For example, just 28 percent of
antenatal care, 26 percent of family planning services and 21 percent of
sick-child care across these countries qualified as ‘effective.’
“Around 15 percent of hospital
expenditure in high-income countries is due to mistakes in care or
patients being infected while in hospitals.”

No comments :
Post a Comment