Analysts, bureaucrats and business leaders are taking stock of
the full implications of President Uhuru Kenyatta’s unprecedented move
to open up borders to Africans.
In his inauguration
speech on Tuesday, the President also promised more goodies for citizens
of the East African Community States – jobs, land and settlement.
If
implemented, the directive means that Africans wishing to visit Kenya
will be eligible to receive a visa at the port of entry, unlike in the
past when many had to go through a rigorous, often expensive process to
secure a visa in Kenyan embassies abroad.
SECURITY
This
move, however, has raised security concerns with one expert warning
that it will present a logistical nightmare because the security
agencies will be required to mount more robust surveillance at all
border points.
It will also mean that the country will
face a significant increase in the number of Africans seeking to enter,
and this will severely test immigration services.
While
other countries such as Rwanda had already made this move, thereby
making Kenya’s decision not entirely groundbreaking, President
Kenyatta’s declaration that East Africans will be treated like Kenyans
is still reverberating across the region.
Analysts
concurred that the move will have far-reaching ramifications on the
soci-economic spheres, especially, security, education, health, labour
and cohesion.
“Like your Kenyan brothers and sisters,
you will need only your identity card. You can now work, do business,
own property, farm, and if you wish and find a willing partner, you can
marry and settle in Kenya,” President Kenyatta said. “And this
commitment we make with no conditions for reciprocity but driven by our
desire for deeper regional integration.”
One security
analyst, Mr Simiyu Werunga, said that while the directive was a good
political statement, it lacked the instruments to ensure that it does
not hurt national security.
CONTRABAND
CONTRABAND
“The
directive has serious implications on national security,” he said,
pointing out that Kenya is not only surrounded by troubled States, but
neighbours Somalia, a region known for active terrorism cells and “the
epicenter of contraband trading.”
Another expert, who
requested not to be named because of the sensitivity of the subject,
said that reciprocity is a key pillar in international relations.
He asked: “Will Kenya, for instance, give the same treatment to citizens of countries whose governments mistreat Kenyans?”
However, the consensus among economists and governance analysts that the Saturday Nation spoke to was that immigration is good for the overall economy.
The East African Trade Union Confederation (EATUC) welcomed the announcement describing it as long overdue.
Mr
Francis Atwoli, the confederation’s chairman, said the organisation has
for the last 15 years been pushing for the establishment of a
borderless Africa.
“We urge the rest of the continent
to take a cue from this bold move by President Kenyatta because this
will ease movement of persons and promote fast economic growth in the
region and on the African continent.”
SCHOLAR
One
scholar, Prof Odhiambo Ndege, who teaches history at Moi University,
said the directive has the potential to make East Africa a better place
socially, economically, politically and culturally. However, this will
only work if the other leaders in the region reciprocate the move, he
said.
“Time has come for African States to think
critically about these border restrictions because they mean little for
the wellbeing of the continent,” he said.
However, another analyst, Mr Herman Manyora, called for high level consultations before the directive is implemented.
He
said every ministry should brainstorm internally on the likely
implications of the directive in each sector, including defence, health,
education and transport.
He predicted that Kenya’s health sector will be strained by expected influx because it is more developed.
EAC
citizens could also be attracted to such social services as free
maternity services in public hospitals if they will be accorded the same
treatment as Kenyans.
Kenya now also offers free and
compulsory education up to secondary level, a policy which could create a
logistical nightmare for teachers, education institutions and managers,
were parents from neighbouring countries to take advantage of Kenya’s
open border policy.
“The country will also have to
grapple with an influx of unskilled labour which could cause social
havoc besides triggering a national security headache,” said Mr Manyora.
IMMIGRATION
IMMIGRATION
However,
the Director of Immigration, Maj Gen (Rtd) Gordon Kihalangwa, said a
lot of thought had gone into the directive at the point the President
made it.
“However, we need to look at it closely and develop modalities of how it will work,” he said.
He said visitors will still be vetted to ensure only well-meaning people get into the country.
President
Kenyatta appears to have been cognisant of this challenge when he
declared: “As I welcome you, I remind you that equally you shall be
subject to the same rules and laws as your Kenyan brothers and sisters.”
Prof
David Kikaya, the director of Research Institute For Peace, Policy and
International Affairs, welcomed the announcement but faulted the
exemption of the reciprocity principle.
“It’s a forward
looking and progressive policy, but it should be made on reciprocity.
This is imperative because we are dealing with very unpredictable
neighbours,” said the former international relations lecturer at the
USIU-Africa.
In Africa, only 13 out of 55 countries
have allowed liberal entry for citizens of other African countries,
either visa free or by issuing visas on arrival.
Those
that are currently visa free for Africans include Rwanda, Benin and
Mauritius. Ghana also introduced a visa on arrival policy for citizens
of African Union member States.
No comments :
Post a Comment