Summary
- At the centre of the dispute is a deal EABL struck to sell Actis 15 acres of land at a price of Sh1.95 billion, but the private equity firm on October 12 last year sent a notice to the beer maker cancelling the offer to buy.
- The notice also included a demand that EABL refunds the Sh1.9 billion Actis had released to the beer maker as per the sale agreement.
- The private equity firm backed out of the deal after EABL allegedly turned its back on a promise it made to build a new head office on the land where Actis planned to develop a business park.
At the centre of the dispute is a
deal EABL struck to sell Actis 15 acres of land at a price of Sh1.95
billion, but the private equity firm on October 12 last year sent a
notice to the beer maker cancelling the offer to buy.
The
notice also included a demand that EABL refunds the Sh1.9 billion Actis
had released to the beer maker as per the sale agreement.
The
private equity firm backed out of the deal after EABL allegedly turned
its back on a promise it made to build a new head office on the land
where Actis planned to develop a business park.
Actis
was to complete the land deal through Kasarani Investment Holdings
Limited (KIHL) — a subsidiary of the private equity firm.
Details
of the fallout have been revealed in a suit Nairobi law firm Kaplan
& Stratton has filed in court, seeking to protect its interests.
Kaplan
& Stratton, which is holding the Sh1.95 billion in an escrow
account, says Actis wrote to it in October last year threatening to take
unspecified action if the law firm did not refund the Sh1.95 billion
together with interest accrued.
EABL has, on the other hand, objected to the letter
rescinding Actis’ offer and demanded that the funds be held in the
escrow account until the parties resolve the dispute. Kaplan &
Stratton has enjoined EABL and KIHL in the suit.
Withdraw suit
Actis,
EABL and Kaplan & Stratton last week agreed to withdraw the suit,
arguing that they are in out-of-court talks, and that if no deal is
struck within 14 days, any of the parties will be free to refer the
matter to arbitration.
Actis has, in an affidavit filed
in court, claimed that EABL was to confirm its commitment to the deal
as well as meet other conditions before September 30, last year but
failed to do so, forcing it to back out.
EABL insists
that it had requested Actis for a one-month extension from September 30,
and just 10 days later confirmed that it was willing to have its head
office developed on the land.
The beer maker says that
despite the assurances to Actis, the private equity firm purported to
rescind its offer to purchase the 15-acre land in Kasarani, leading to
the stand-off.
“At the status update meeting (on
October 10) and at the express request of KIHL, EABL confirmed that it
was substantially ready to comply with the conditions within a few days.
Notwithstanding the assurances given by EABL to KIHL regarding its
preparedness to complete, KIHL purported to issue a recession notice,”
the beer maker says.
EABL says that upon receipt of the
purported recession notice it issued a letter dated October 13, 2016
rejecting the purported recession notice on the basis that it was
defective.
But Actis holds that EABL’s request for a
one-month extension to get necessary corporate approvals came only three
days to the September 30, 2016 deadline that had been set.
The
private equity firm says it was unable to approve EABL’s request for
more time before the September 30 deadline, and that it was unsure of
getting management approvals for the extension.
EABL
now says that it took KIHL’s failure to respond to its request for
extension of time to mean the private equity firm had agreed.
Recession notice
The
brewer claims that the recession notice sparked a dispute that needed
to be resolved through arbitration as provided for in the sale
agreement.
But Actis insists that EABL had not
specified the nature of the dispute it wanted to be referred to an
arbitrator, which was a clear indication of foul play by the brewer.
“It
was not clear whether such approval would be granted given the fact
that it had been over 15 months since the sale agreement was signed and a
30 per cent deposit paid and almost four months since the full balance
of the purchase price had been paid,” Actis says.
The
private equity firm argues that it was grossly unfair for EABL to fail
to fulfill the conditions of the deal and then subsequently direct
Kaplan & Stratton not to comply with their duty as escrow agents to
release money to KIHL without any attempt to give reasons.
Actis
is said to have argued during a meeting with EABL that the project only
made sense if the beer maker committed to taking up office space on the
land.
EABL
says that since the standoff, it has engaged Actis and its subsidiary
KIHL in goodwill talks with a view to reaching a solution that is
agreeable to both parties but that is yet to come through.
Actis,
through KIHL, paid Sh585 million or 30 per cent of the purchase price
in June 2015 before remitting the 70 per cent balance of Sh1.365 billion
in May last year to Kaplan & Stratton, the escrow agent.
No comments :
Post a Comment