Prof Makame Mbarawa, the Minister for
Works, Transport and Communication, said by paying in cash, the
government paid 23.5 million US dollar for each instead of 31.0 million
US dollars if it had chosen another payment modality.
“In outright purchases you will not pay
interest rates and in addition you get more bargaining powers,” he said
during a live telecast by Tanzania Broadcasting Corporation (TBC) on
Monday where he described as baseless claims that the government made
wasteful spending by paying in cash during the purchases of the two
aircrafts expected in the country next month.
He said the decision to pay the money
upfront was taken after weighing its benefits against those of other
payment modalities “No research no right to speak and for this matter
you don’t need a thorough research. You can just google,” he said.
Prof Mbarawa also defended the choice of
Bombardier Q400 turboprop airplanes saying they have proved to be more
economical for short trips like regional routes in Tanzania because they
have lower fuel consumption and can operate from shorter runways than
jet engine aircrafts.
According to him, the new aircrafts were
superior on short-haul flights compared to jet engine aircrafts and
were therefore more ideal for regional routes which are usually short
and where there are small airports, low traffic density routes, and the
challenging running ways.
Bombardier Q400 turboprop airplanes
required only 1.45 kilometre long runway for take-off and landing
compared to jet engine aircrafts which require a runway of a minimum of
2.09 kilometres, he said.
On fuel use, the Bombardier Q400
turboprop airplanes were more economical as they use 1.7 tonnes of fuel
for a one-way trip to say Mwanza compared to 3.7 tonnes of fuel per for a
similar trip by jet engine aircrafts, he said.
Prof Mbarawa said the Q400 aircrafts
have a cruising speed close to that of most jet engine aircrafts whereas
while an Airbus takes 1 hour and 10 minutes to Mwanza, the Q400 would
take 1 hour and 35 minutes and an ATR 2 hours.
According to Prof Mbarawa, the time
spent on taxiing, takeoff and landing virtually eliminates a competing
jet’s speed advantage.
The turboprop aircraft have the lowest
cost per passenger than its rivals and aircraft break even with about
1/3 of its seats filled making it particularly attractive on routes with
varying passenger numbers where many seats would be empty on some
flights.
For a 76-seat Bombardier Q400 turboprop
aircraft can break even with only 26 passengers which is about 1/3 of
seats filled while for a 124-seat Airbus you break even with 76
passengers,” he said.
No comments :
Post a Comment