KATARE MBASHIRU
THE LAW Reform Commission of Tanzania (LRCT) has released its preliminary report on the reformation of the Procurement Act, which has expressed divided opinions and views from stakeholders.
Attorney General (AG) George Masaju
tasked the commission in December last year to work on four terms of
reference that would later suggest how best the procurement law could be
amended or overhauled.
The report was handed over to Justice
and Constitutional Affairs Minister Dr Harrison Mwakyembe in Dar es
Salaam for further legal procedures.
According to LRCT Chairman, Judge
Aloysius Mujulizi, the commission initiated the review by calling for
recommendations, suggestions and views from government institutions, the
general public and other stakeholders.
The move came barely three weeks after
President John Magufuli gave his speech to inaugurate parliament in
which he hinted that the procurement law would be amended to seal
loopholes for embezzlement of public funds.
During the inaugural speech in November
last year, President Magufuli spoke at length how the public procurement
law was being abused by unscrupulous suppliers who quote inflated and
unrealistic prices of commodities, causing massive losses of public
funds. Judge Mujulizi hinted that the preliminary report came up with
two conflicting views from stakeholders who gave their opinion.
On one hand, he said many people who
submitted their views suggested that basing on the state of the country
and economy currently, the procurement law was outdated and hence the
dire need to amend it immediately even as more research continues.
Views from the minority suggested that
there were no problems with the procurement law. But the problem was on
implementation of the legislation something that led to loss of
government’s funds.
They suggested that the commission be given more time to assess and analyse views from stakeholders.
“We took a short time to release our
report because of the importance of this law. Procurement constitutes 70
per cent of the country’s revenue.
Therefore this law is very important,’’
he noted. In analysing views from stakeholders, LRCT focused on various
thematic areas including, value for money, market fundamentals and
dynamics of the law, procurement process and procedural and
institutional requirements, contradiction of laws and human factors
(corruption and embezzlement).
“The laws are contradicting one another,
whereas one law gives stiffer penalty and punishment to whoever
contravenes its provisions, while another law mitigates the penalty, and
this provides room for people to continue losing the country’s money
due to that weakness,’’ he added.
Judge Mujulizi said his commission
needed more time in order to analyse views provided by stakeholders
before compiling the final report.
Speaking after receiving the report, Dr
Mwakyembe said his team would spend the whole day and that today, he
would submit that report to Finance and Planning Minister Dr Philip
Mpango and later to the AG before the final decision on what should be
done after the cabinet meeting.
Experience indicates that since 2001
when the Act was enacted for the first time, there were some
difficulties in the implementation of the law so much that objectives
for its enactment have not been achieved.
This phenomenon has persisted even when
Parliament repealed and re-enacted the new Public Procurement Act in
2004. The procedural requirements, before making the actual purchase,
are both cumbersome and costly.
No comments :
Post a Comment