David Mpanga, Dr Besigye’s lawyer, described the speedy move in which
Besigye's file was transferred from the Magistrate’s Court to the High
Court at the request of the Director of Public Prosecutions as abnormal
and alarming. Dr Kizza Besigye had instituted a case against the
government over his continued house arrest. PHOTO | FILE
By HALIMA ABDALLAH
In Summary
The Ugandan judiciary is in the crosshairs yet again, this
time regarding the file of the case Dr Kizza Besigye instituted against
the government over his continued house arrest.
In a seemingly calculated move to prolong Dr Besigye’s house
arrest, the file has moved from the Magistrate’s Court to the High Court
at the request of the Director of Public Prosecutions, at a speed his
lawyer David Mpanga described as abnormal and alarming.
“The whole process happened between 4am and 2.30pm. It is very abnormal,” said Mr Mpanga.
On February 26, Dr Besigye made an application to the Kasangati
Magistrates Court against the Inspector General of Police Kale Kayihura
and Regional Police Commander for Kampala north Wesley Nganizi, seeking
orders to have the police vacate the entrance to his home and free him.
Dr Besigye, who has been under house arrest since February 18,
invoked provisions of the Police Act that safeguard persons against
arbitrary arrest and detention.
Upon receipt of the application, the Magistrate’s Court presided
over by Prossy Katushabe fixed March 17 as the hearing date, only for
the file to be presented before court on March 9, in the absence of Dr
Besigye’s lawyers. Blaming the court clerk for the carelessness, the
magistrate dismissed the case filed by Besigye before reinstating it
later.
But the hearing did not take place on March 17 as the DPP’s
representative Caroline Nabaasa asked for more time to study the file.
When hearing resumed on March 18, the DPP objected to the
Magistrate Court’s jurisdiction on grounds that Dr Besigye had filed a
similar case in the High Court’s civil division and therefore a lower
court could not proceed with the hearing of the criminal application.
The Magistrate’s Court overruled the DPP’s argument and heard
the merits and demerits of the case — to free or not to free Dr Besigye
on March 21. But as the hearing in the Magistrate’s Court was going on,
the DPP was making an ex-parte application at the High Court, asking it
to review the decision of the lower court to continue hearing Dr
Besigye’s case.
The High Court Registrar granted the DPP’s request. “Reference
is made to the above matter in which the DPP has petitioned the High
Court for a revision. You are requested to send the file to the High
Court immediately,” reads a letter from the High Court, dated March 21,
2016, signed by High Court Criminal Division Deputy Registrar Eleanor M.
Khainza.
On March 21, magistrate Katushabe forwarded the file and asked the High Court to acknowledge receipt of the same.
This kind of application is not irregular, but the motive behind
the fast transfer of the file at the last minute – when a ruling was
expected – is what is puzzling the lawyers and observers who turned up
on March 22 at Kasangati Magistrate’s Court to hear the ruling.
Dr Besigye’s lawyers argue that the DPP could have waited for
the ruling and then appealed against it if he was not satisfied. The
lawyers argue that the DPP’s choice of procedure will only serve to
prolong Dr Besigye’s imprisonment.
“The Registrar who signed the letter was attending a workshop
that day. We do not know how things work any more at the judiciary. We
call upon the Chief Justice to take charge of his house. Besigye went to
court to seek justice and this is what he gets,” said Yusuf Nsibambi,
one of Dr Besigye’s lawyers.
No comments :
Post a Comment