By JOINT REPORT The EastAfrican
In Summary
- Riek Machar dismissed as untrue, accusations levelled against him by a top US diplomat and East African leaders, of continuing a war that has claimed thousands of lives and may soon cause a famine.
- The notion of targeted sanctions against those who obstruct the peace process and commit serious human-rights violations in South Sudan has been discussed at length in the UN Security Council meetings. However, sources say that it appears that some Council members would prefer to have Igad impose the sanctions first before the Council follows suit.
- According to the Machar group, the US is misinformed and the region has turned a blind eye to violations of the ceasefire by Kiir’s government.
As the Intergovernmental Authority on
Development (Igad) warned of possible sanctions against the protagonists
in the South Sudan conflict, former vice president turned rebel leader
Riek Machar dismissed as untrue, accusations levelled against him by a
top US diplomat and East African leaders, of continuing a war that has
claimed thousands of lives and may soon cause a famine.
Instead, Dr Machar demanded that former detainees,
civil society and other political parties be excluded from ongoing
talks in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, to allow for direct negotiations between
him and President Salva Kiir’s government.
“Peace talks mean solving differences between
warring parties. I accept the Igad mandate and their obligation to bring
peace to RSS. But talks must deal with the warring parties first, so as
to resolve the cause of the crisis to address an inclusive way
forward,” Dr Machar said in a tweet last Wednesday night.
Dr Machar’s team snubbed the peace talks in Addis
Ababa last Tuesday to protest the inclusion of other groups, a move that
could jeopardise regional and international efforts aimed at finding a
political and home grown solution to the turmoil in South Sudan.
The failure by Dr Machar’s team to show up when
the fifth round of peace talks got underway in Addis Ababa on Monday,
prompted Ethiopian Prime Minister Hailemariam Desalegn, who is the Igad
chairperson, to warn of unspecified “punitive action that has to be
taken immediately after convening the meeting of Igad Heads of State and
Government in Addis Ababa very soon after this summit.”
The notion of targeted sanctions against those who
obstruct the peace process and commit serious human-rights violations
in South Sudan has been discussed at length in the UN Security Council
meetings. And as the Council met on Thursday last week, it was expected
that some members would reiterate sanctions as a viable option for the
Council’s upcoming consultations.
However, sources say that it appears that some
Council members would prefer to have Igad impose the sanctions first
before the Council follows suit.
“The difficulty is that it seems that there are
some divisions within Igad on this issue, perhaps given that some of its
member states have strong political and economic ties to South Sudan,”
said a source.
During a meeting with Kenya’s President Uhuru
Kenyatta and leaders of three other Igad member states on the sidelines
of the US-Africa Summit, US Secretary of State John Kerry declared: “It
is our judgement — and the former vice president Mr Machar needs to
understand this — that it was his initiative that broke the agreement
and took his troops back into a violent status.”
Mr Desalegn echoed Mr Kerry’s accusation, saying Machar was responsible for the violation of the ceasefire.
But Dr Machar’s camp dismissed the claims as
unfounded: “We see this as a biased stance by Mr Kerry. The US Secretary
of State did not condemn the onset of massacres of Nuer civilians in
Juba in mid-December by President Kiir’s guards, but rushed to condemn
our forces for the subsequent killings in other areas,” said Dr Machar’s
Spokesperson James Gatdet Dak.
According to the Machar group, the US is
misinformed and the region has turned a blind eye to violations of the
ceasefire by Kiir’s government.
“He did not condemn the government for violation
of the January 23 Cessation of Hostilities. He did not condemn the
government even when the army chief of staff Gen Paul Malong Awan last
month arrogantly admitted that his troops deliberately violated the
agreement in order to gain more territories before the May 9 agreement
between our chairman, Dr Riek Machar and President Salva Kiir. Kerry is,
therefore, misinformed,” the spokesman added.
Dr Machar insists that direct talks between the
government and the rebels will expedite the peace process while the
other stakeholders participate in a consultative manner.
No comments :
Post a Comment