I had the dubious honour of being pulled
over by traffic police manning a road-block on Lang’ata Road last
Friday just before midnight. My family and I had attended my niece’s
wedding at Maanzoni Lodge and we were headed back home when we
encountered the now infamous Alcoblow police-check.
Considering
the wedding was a party where all manner of beverages, alcohol
included, formed part of the menu, it was agreed that I be the
designated driver. I therefore stuck to non-alcoholic beverages.
Back
on Lang’ata road, the officer who pulled us over seemed convinced that
all the car’s occupants had indulged and felt it was best that I undergo
the test.
Fair enough. The policeman was, after all, carrying out his duties as would be expected.
However,
standing right behind him, camera in hand, was a journalist who was
observing the proceedings, waiting for a juicy story. I was perhaps too
calm to qualify for a cameo role in his anticipated scoop — yet.
So off I went with the polite policeman towards the nerve centre where I would prove my innocence.
Now
this is where it gets interesting. As the second police officer
carefully explained to me the procedure to be followed in this
situation, the camera started rolling.
I had a choice:
go off on a tangent and give the cameraman the tongue lashing of his
life. But where would that leave me? Looking as drunk as a sailor.
The
second option was to maintain my cool, listen to the officer telling me
to “blow until I tell you to stop”, and peacefully drive the clan home.
I
chose the latter and I happily scored 0.00 per cent alcohol content to
the amazement of both the officer and the journalist. He actually held
up the results for the cameraman to record.
NO CONSENT TO FILM
I have recounted these events with the sole purpose of exposing a serious breach of the law.
While
I applaud the NTSA, the police and Cabinet Secretary Michael Kamau’s
efforts to rid our roads of drunk drivers, I am peeved by their
enthusiasm for recording would-be offenders and offenders alike on tape.
The
Constitution confers on me and every other Kenyan the right to privacy.
If in doubt, see Chapter 4 starting with Article 31: “Every person has
the right to privacy which includes the right which includes the right
not to have — (a) their person, home or property searched... (c)
information relating to their family or private affairs unnecessarily
required or revealed...
Rights belong to an individual
and are not granted by the State, which, however, is duty-bound to
ensure these rights are not abused.
According to
Article 21 (1) it is the fundamental duty of the State and every State
organ to observe, respect, protect, promote and fulfil the rights and
fundamental freedoms in the Bill of Rights.
At no time
did the offending journalist ask for my consent to film me, nor did the
policemen protect my rights by informing me of the camera’s presence.
NTSA officials, whose vehicles were parked by the roadside, did nothing either to ensure that my rights were respected.
State
agencies are required by law to ensure their actions do not go beyond
the ambit of the law, and the Bill of Rights is at the heart of all
laws.
Fundamental rights are, by their very nature,
inalienable. They are synonymous with human rights, and the world over,
they transcend jurisdictions.
To understand just how
crucial the Bill of Rights is, one has to go back to the preamble of our
supreme law. “We the people” gave life to the Constitution and we gave
each and everyone of us these fundamental rights.
So,
before State agencies invite the media to cover how well their policies
are working, they should be duly warned that they are infringing on the
rights of individuals and these individuals can seek protection of those
rights in a court of law.
Our appetite for reality TV is at best nauseating and the State authorities are pandering to this craving.
Ms Mbeneka is an advocate of the High Court practising in Nairobi. (mbeneka@gmail.com)
No comments :
Post a Comment