Kenyans evacuated from South Sudan arriving at the Wilson Airport in
Nairobi. The last group of about 100 Kenyans arrive at the Jomo Kenyatta
International Airport. PHOTO/EVANS HABIL
NATION
Wary of loss of investments by its
nationals and the influx of refugees into the country, Kenya has taken a
leading role in preventing South Sudan violence from spiralling into a
full-blown civil war by leading the mediation talks in Addis Ababa,
Ethiopia.
A number of businesses, especially those
outside Juba, have at best remained closed and at worst been looted by
the warring factions in the violence that exploded on December 15.
According
to the government, most Kenyan businesses in Malakal, Bentiu and Bor
were looted by factions allied to President Salva Kiir or to his former
deputy Riek Machar.
The three towns in Upper Nile,
Unity and Jonglei states have experienced the heaviest fighting,
according to Foreign Affairs Principal Secretary Karanja Kibicho.
“There
was sporadic fighting in Juba, but that was contained. However, Kenyan
businesses in Jonglei, Unity and Upper Nile states were ransacked and
are grounded,” the PS said.
Mr Kibicho said Kenya’s
interest in South Sudan cannot be overstated as the country hosts many
individual Kenyan business people, workers and corporates and the
violence has a “direct impact” on Kenyans.
Besides,
Kenya is wary of a refugee influx which would further strain the
country’s capacity since it already hosts at least half a million Somali
refugees with accompanying security threats.
Prior to
their secession from Sudan, thousands of South Sudanese refugees fleeing
two decades of war with Khartoum swarmed the Kakuma refugee camp in
northwestern Kenya.
“Kenya’s involvement to restore
peace in South Sudan is because we want to prevent an influx of refugees
from South Sudan because our hands are already full with the Somali
refugees,” the PS said.
On the business front, the safety and survival of Kenyan-owned businesses in South Sudan is a top priority.
In
terms of foreign investments, Kenya has the largest presence, according
to the chief executive officer of the Kenya Bankers Association (KBA)
Habil Olaka.
Among the major Kenyan corporates in
South Sudan are the Kenya Commercial Bank (KCB), Equity Bank,
Co-operative Bank and the financial services group UAP Holding and
Resolution Group among others.
There are also projected
joint regional investments such as the Lamu Port-Southern
Sudan-Ethiopia Transport (LAPSETT) and the standard gauge railway
projects which would be adversely affected by a civil war in the world’s
newest country.
ATTRACTION
Oil-rich
South Sudan is also an attraction for many countries, Kenya included.
The violence has seen a severe reduction in oil production as forces
loyal to Dr Machar seized the main oil-producing region of Malakal in
Upper Nile State.
Mr Olaka said that most of the
Kenyan banks with branches outside Juba have been forced to close them
and consolidate operations within Juba as they monitor the situation.
The
KBA boss predicted that Kenya stands to lose massively unless a
solution is reached soon and called on the government to seize the
opportunity and move in to normalise the situation.
While
Mr Olaka is hesitant to put a figure on the losses Kenyan corporates
and individuals have incurred so far, he said the cost of doing business
was rising rapidly as the entities still in operation have had to scale
down operations while also increasing the security of their premises
and personnel left behind
.
.
“The losses by these
entities have been in terms of foregone opportunities. There is also an
increase in the cost of securing foreigners, especially the key
individuals that an entity wishes to retain to oversee the operations,”
he told the Sunday Nation.
The CEO of Resolution Group
Peter Nduati tweeted on January 2 that they were still serving their
clients using South Sudan nationals who decided to stay but said “it’s a
scale down” on business operations.
“It is difficult
especially if you consider the HR angle. Difficult to make a decision
regarding resumption of business in South Sudan with all the conflicting
info,” Mr Nduati tweeted.
President Uhuru Kenyatta
appointed a special envoy, Gen (rtd)Lazaro Sumbeiywo, to lead the
mediation between the rival factions. Gen Sumbeiywo is mediating between
President Kiir and Dr Machar under the auspices of the
Inter-Governmental Authority on Development (Igad).
Gen
Sumbeiywo was also a principal mediator in the talks that led to the
2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement between the North and the South.
The
talks to end the violence began Friday in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, with
the mediators meeting separately with representatives of President Kiir
and Dr Machar. However, Kenya was optimistic that the two groups would
be able to meet face-to-face by Saturday for the start of the actual
mediation.
“We are asking them to cease fighting and
open corridors for relief supplies to reach the affected people and the
President (Mr Kenyatta) has said that Kenya will continue airlifting
emergency supplies despite all Kenyans having been evacuated,” said Mr
Kibicho, explaining that Kenya would not take sides in the conflict.
President
Kenyatta also said the Igad states would not allow an unconstitutional
change of government in South Sudan, a comment that was taken to mean
that Kenya was favouring President Kiir in the conflict.
But
the PS said that is far from the truth, and all the President meant was
that if there is to be a change of government, it should be done within
the confines of the constitution.
Kenya’s engagement
in the conflict will be limited to airlifting relief supplies and
restoring peace and stability, said Mr Kibicho as he dismissed the
possibility of Kenya Defence Forces’ involvement in South Sudan.
Ugandan
President Yoweri Museveni was quoted in sections of the press as saying
that his country would intervene militarily in South Sudan especially
if forces loyal to Dr Machar do not end the violence.
However,
Mr Kibicho said President Museveni’s comments were taken out of context
since the Ugandan President was only referring to securing vital
installations and not military involvement in the conflict.
POLITICAL AND ECONOMICAL INTERESTS
According
to Prof Karuti Kanyinga of the University of Nairobi, Kenya’s interest
in South Sudan is both from a security and economic point of view unlike
Uganda “which has always been openly biased in their political
involvement.”
“Kenya has got more to lose than Uganda.
The only way out is through power-sharing, but they will have to amend
their constitution for that solution to happen. Without power -sharing,
South Sudan may just remain unstable,” said Prof Kanyinga. But it is
understood that President Kiir has ruled out any power-sharing
arrangement with his rival.
Prof Kanyinga’s
prescription to the problem also calls for President Kiir and Dr Machar
to think of accommodating other smaller communities in whatever form of
government they may agree to form outside their Dinka and Nuer
ethnicities.
President Kiir is from the Dinka community while Mr Machar is a Nuer.
“South
Sudan needs a visionary leader. (John) Garang had a vision but he died
with that vision while President Kiir has always been a military man.
What is required is a master plan for development of all regions of the
country,” he added.
The latest violence several months
after President Kiir sacked a number of ministers including Dr Machar
who was his VP. Dr Machar has accused President Kiir of trying to
eliminate political rivals. He had indicated his intention to oppose the
President for the leadership of the ruling party, the Sudan People’s
Liberation Movement (SPLM)
No comments :
Post a Comment