F-16 aircraft from the US Air Force Thunderbirds perform during a exhibition air show. Photo/AFP
By Daniel Ondieki
In the one year since I started writing aviation
articles, I have not answered what is perhaps the most fundamental
question of all. How do planes fly?
Most people have a rough idea of the physics
behind it. Any heavier object than air such as a plane or a bird is able
to stay suspended in the air thanks to the production of a force called
lift which primarily counters the weight of the object.
While lift is produced by many surfaces in a plane, it’s the wings that are responsible for most of the useful lift.
The theory goes that the upper surface of the wing
is curved and consequently that air has to travel faster to arrive at
the trailing edge of the wing at the same time as air that went around
the bottom of the wing.
This increased velocity also a result of the wing
acting as a venturi similar to pinching a hose pipe with flowing water,
causes a reduction of pressure on the top part of the wing thanks to the
Bernoulli effect. The pressure differential across the bottom and top
parts of the wing produces lift.
This explanation was not only taught in school but repeated in all the principles of flight texts that I have read.
It turns out this is wrong. It cannot explain how
planes with conventional wings can fly upside down, or how symmetrical
wings produce lift.
The problem it turns out is that production of
lift is a very complex subject that cannot be distilled into a simple
convenient explanation. That being said, it hasn’t stopped people from
trying.
A Nasa website clearly designed in the 90s and
never updated to reflect modern times, informs us that the air taking
the longer path at the top of the wing actually arrives at the trailing
edge well ahead of the air at the bottom with an added downward
direction. This new downward motion imparted on the air as per Newton’s
laws of motion must be counteracted by an equal and opposite reaction
which is lift.
Other explanations involve complex mathematical formulae derived by long deceased physicists.
It turns out Bernoulli is still involved in the
race. Once the velocity of the air around the wing has been determined
using better methods, Bernoulli’s formula can be used to calculate the
actual pressure at each point around the wing. A knowledge of this
pressure field can be used to calculate the lift. In other words the
popular explanation of lift has the cart before the horse.
At this point we may wonder whether it even
matters. The popular explanation of lift certainly doesn’t seem to have
harmed generations of pilots despite being wrong.
Having the most accurate base knowledge helps us
better understand how our planes fly in our day to day work. And no one
requires us to know anything more detailed than the straightforward
explanation.
The finer details of the Navier Stokes equation can be left to the aeronautical engineers.
Dr Ondieki is a pilot with an international airline
No comments :
Post a Comment