Pension funds: Need to switch from educational binge to focused realism
14th August 2011
Email
Print
Comments
Local
pension experts are beginning to see the need to shift from the
parastatal outlook of the ‘lack of financial and pension literacy’ in
the tendency to withdraw accumulated or saved funds when one ceases to
hold a job.
The trend is towards greater realism as to the causes of the situation, especially how pension plans increasingly to compete with other outlets needing funds, like building houses for rental.
The trend is towards greater realism as to the causes of the situation, especially how pension plans increasingly to compete with other outlets needing funds, like building houses for rental.
Often however, members withdraw funds
simply to be able to stand on their feet again after a job 'evaporates,'
chiefly on account of trying to live within the same environment,
especially in relation to rental obligations or family.
There is however need for further
exploration of potential usefulness of financial and pension literary
where it can help lead to a change in behaviour, that is, where members
remove funds for certain other purposes without being in dire need to
do so.
And even in the latter context,
counsellors in the pension field believe that with a little effort many
off the job individuals could have re-adapted rather painlessly without
having to withdraw funds. “It is really a matter of how people are
prepared psychologically,” intimates Christian Gaya, a pension rights
activist.
His research is focusing on how to build
an educational strategy enabling some key target groups to appreciate
the usefulness of participating in pension schemes, and retaining their
cash there even in rather thin situations.
He believes education conducted by the
main public pension funds would help to improve what is now a low
pension membership and savings for retirement where by denying oneself
access to those funds. That could help push up membership enrolment and
retention rates up to actual retirement.
Yet however there is need to sharpen the
focus all the way, namely from the position that perceived low literacy
or exposure to serious discussion with an involved or authoritative
person, or in peer groups concerning financial and pension matters, is
not directly a cause of low retention of funds.
Since it is possible to establish that
there is low literacy, it is rather easy to take up the theme that were
this lacunae to be corrected, the low savings or poor membership and low
retention levels could be corrected.
It is a bit of a rosy dream but it is
unlikely to bear fruit in that manner, but only when one has done the
necessary sifting of the material – that is, individuals and their
situations – and find the group that is more likely to be receptive to
financial and pension education as behaviour rectifying awareness.
That is partly what is tantalizing about
an education focus in relation to pension planning and financial
literacy as a whole, that it can't be hinged on expecting that once a
budding professional who is already unto his first job after college,
will seek to take up pension planning after two or three modules of
exposure. There is preliminary work of displacing other avenues of
preparing for old age which are often more attractive, of which small
business is the most notable.
Some executives in pension funds lament
the wider ignorance of financial planning and awareness of old age
perils, or routine risks of informal sector activity, etc. However given
the low level of pension savings yield in terms of actually ensuring a
relaxed lifestyle or minimal assurance without other resources,
education may have to actually focus on pension plan as a necessary
auxiliary to one's other adaptation efforts to end of job situations.
That opens up an educational strategy
challenge on the part of pension funds as well, since its most self-
indulgent or marketing blitz sort of outlook usually focuses on fronting
its product and specialized products for that matter, as the answer to
one's old age or post-retirement needs.
Yet, what analysts would call the
'sub-optimal minimum wage,' where the salary that forms the framework of
payments generally isn't sufficient for living, pension benefits tend
to be equally constrained as well. They are not tailored to suit
reliance on those benefits, but presume that pension is only auxiliary
to self reliance.
So the major problem is in designing a
workable strategy to bring into the fold potential pension plan
participants who may have their focus only on petty trade or formal
sector marginal presence like the 'frames' mushrooming in Dar es Salaam,
changing the face of streets in residential areas, from the main roads
to tarmac streets inwards.
Trying as best as one could in seeking to
'address the knowledge gap’ in relation to financial and pension
planning is that it has to be established that it is a significant
influencing factor to pension planning behavior.
The problem is that when exploring causes
and consequences of a low rate of savings (behavior) and trying to link
it directly with lack of knowledge in that area could prove to be
ineffective in the market.
There has to be plenty of preliminary
work, for instance who really feels the pain about low membership rates -
whether it really is the pensioners themselves who would be regretting
not to have taken up a plan, or it is pension funds worried about their
margins when the withdrawal is too noticeable. Again it may be worth
examining if this pinches more one major fund or smaller ones, depending
on how thin or thick is their membership basis.
Again pension funds have investment
platforms which in large measure have tended to outgrow the savings base
as the proper source of funds for investments, partly due to the fact
that their payment of benefits is often marginal in character. So,
withdrawal of membership is one thing to current pensioners, and another
to future pensioners and for that matter to pension funds.
Without addressing the problem of
optimality or sufficiency for minimal assurance of living, both for the
minimum wage and the pensions that retired people get, touting education
could easily become a case of crocodile tears, that the number of
workers available for exploitation is increasingly insufficient.
SOURCE:
GUARDIAN ON SUNDAY
No comments :
Post a Comment