The insecurity in the north eastern part of Kenya where Al
Shabaab has staged deadly attacks requires concerted efforts to
rein in the militants.
rein in the militants.
Last week, the US Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) warned American air carriers to “exercise caution”
when flying over Kenyan airspace, citing possible attacks by extremists.
The
area covered by the warning cuts through the North Eastern Kenya. The
Somali border is to the east of the area of caution. Americans consider
it a war zone, as the Kenya Defence Forces (KDF) is fighting the Al
Shabaab there. The KDF also operates in the zone.
Already,
the education sector in the north has been hurt following the
withdrawal of more than 2,000 teachers by the government over safety
concerns.
While Al Shabaab has used the presence of
Kenyan troops in Somalia where they are stationed under the African
Union Mission in Somalia (Amisom) as an excuse to launch attacks in the
country, it is evident that it could have designs to take control of the
expansive Northern Kenya region.
According to think tanks like the International Crisis Group,
disrupting social services such as education, in the region risks
further stunting the region’s development.
Moreover, it
could deepen the sense of marginalisation by the State that many
residents feel in northern Kenyan thus hindering Kenya’s efforts to curb
Islamist militancy by winning "the hearts and minds" of locals and
potentially even fuelling Al-Shabaab’s recruitment.
A former Horn of Africa researcher, Abdullahi Abdile, argues that the status quo is unsustainable.
Leaving
the region’s economy to drift further downward and its youngsters
without proper schooling would create tremendous human costs, he
observes.
Moreover, he posits that while the appeal of
militancy defies generic description and varies from individual to
individual, denying educational opportunities to the youth in an already
poor and under-served area cannot help in the battle against the
extremists.
"As it works to restore security and the
services that have been lost in the north east, the Kenyan government
should pay particular attention to reversing Al-Shabaab’s campaign to
hollow out educational institutions, writes Abdile noting that failure
to do so could come at a huge cost to the rest of the country.
According
to governance, security sector and political science experts, due to
the complexity of the situation, any solution to the Al Shabaab menace
must get the support of political leaders both in Kenya and Somalia.
However,
at this time, the leadership in both countries appear to be working at
cross purposes, which means the prospect of wiping out the militia and
returning normalcy to the war-torn country will remain a pipe dream for
the foreseeable future. The latest row between Nairobi and Mogadishu
over Kenya's alleged interference with the latter's internal affairs
does not help the situation.
Somalia had threatened to report Kenya to the UN but Nairobi strongly rejects the accusations.
“Kenya
rejects the unwarranted and invalid allegations made by the Federal
Government of Somalia and takes great exception to the fabricated
indictments of interfering in Somalia’s internal affairs," said the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a note.
On Monday,
there were reported clashes between the Somalia National Army and the
Jubaland security forces near the Mandera border.
Somali
President Mohammed Farmajo has been at odds with Kenya's support for
Jubaland President Ahmed Madobe and tensions between the two leaders
worsened after the Somali National Army deployed 700 troops in the Gedo
region.
Despite calls by the US for dialogue to resolve
the row between the two leaders, the troops remain there. Kenya has
been on the side of Madobe whose authority is seen as providing a buffer
to the chaos in Somalia.
Opinion is, however, divided on the viability of this strategy with Al Shabaab attacks continuing.
Kenya and Somalia are also at loggerheads over a disputed 62,000-square-mile oil and gas-rich area in the Indian Ocean.
The
International Court of Justice (ICJ) is set to begin hearing the matter
in June. The mistrust between the two countries was the reason Nairobi
became alarmed by the secret visit by 11 MPs to Mogadishu where they
held talks with Farmajo.
For long, Kenya adopted a
posture of non-interference in the internal affairs of its neighbours,
making it the destination of hoice for refugees fleeing conflict.
Kenya was also the base of many peace deals that ended wars in countries such as Somalia, Uganda and Sudan.
This
investment cannot be in vain. It may, however, require that Kenya
change tack if it is to succeed in securing its territory.
This
would include working with other countries to resolve the political
dispute between Farmajo and Madobe and reduce or stop the attacks.
No comments:
Post a Comment