In Busia, owners of bars have either been forced to close, open branches
on the other side of the border or simply smuggle the beer to sell at
the lower rate on the Kenyan side. FILE PHOTO | NATION MEDIA GROUP
In Busia town the difference between a cold and a warm beer is as high as Sh170.
You
have the option to buy three warm beers of the same brand or drink just
one bottle of a cold one, thanks to the huge taxation difference for
alcoholic beverages between the two neighbouring countries.
Bar
owners who have resorted to smuggling cheaper beer from Uganda cannot
keep them in refrigerators, where enforcement agencies would find them
during crackdowns, hence the relationship between temperature of the
drinks and their prices.
The warm
beer is definitely from Uganda and retails at between Sh80 and Sh100
while the cold one is Kenyan and will attract between Sh200 and Sh250 in
shopping centres spread along the border from Busia to Malaba.
Why is beer so cheap in Uganda?
For
one litre of beer, the Uganda Revenue Authority taxes anything between
Sh18 and Sh51 (in Kenya shillings) depending on the content. That
essentially means that save for the bottle, beer from Uganda could be
retailing for as little as Sh9.
In Kenya, tax on beer has almost doubled in
the past five years, according to data from the Kenya Revenue Authority,
with the latest figure at Sh110.62 for every litre. A bottle would,
therefore, comprise up to Sh55 in excise taxes only, more than seven
times the Ugandan rate if you add the 16 per cent Value Added Tax.
It
is KRA’s hunger for revenue that now drives hundreds of thirsty
revellers across to Uganda and other border areas to partake of cheaper
alcohol or smuggle it to the Kenyan side, a move that is giving local
brewers and border-based law enforcement agencies sleepless nights. Bar
owners have also been left with no option but to buy from Uganda to stay
in business. In the little town of Adungosi on the newly built
Busia-Malaba road, we find a bar located on the left side of the road
and metres away from Uganda with various smuggling routes frequented by
motorcycles just behind the yellow building.
Wide taxation gulf
The
bar owner, only identified as James, confessed to Smart Company that
about 90 per cent of his stock comes from Uganda in order to keep the
customer in Kenya from straying across the border.
“We
only stock a few bottles of Kenyan beer in the fridges for formality
but all bars here sell beer from Uganda. If I don’t sell at the same
rate as it is sold the other side of the border, I will lose all these
customers. I have children to educate and I will not just close my
business and watch others continue,” James said.
It
is not just alcohol. The trek across to Uganda is so rampant that
people cross to buy sugar, chickens and clothes or to access services
including gyms.
The two East African
neighbours have such a wide taxation gulf that though Uganda is
landlocked and imports its goods through Kenya, where it is transported
around 1,000 kilometres to reach the border, it is still cheaper to buy
goods from there.
The border towns on
the Uganda side rely on Kenyans economically and a walk across in the
evening reveals just that. Most bars have vehicles with Kenyan
registration plates parked outside and Kenyan mobile money transfer
services dominate the shops, including till numbers that will enable you
to buy using M-Pesa.
Sellers prefer
to use Kenya shillings and life is more Kenyan than Ugandan in terms of
business as money flows from the Kenyan side with people fleeing high
taxation.
Cheap goods from Uganda
have been finding their way into the Kenyan market through the largely
unmanned porous border points lined up along the Busia-Malaba stretch.
In
fact, just metres away from the designated crossing point, a narrow
earth road winds through an open market and a dumpsite on to the Uganda
side. Trucks are often parked and offloaded even in broad daylight near
the famous Hotel Itoya.
The goods are
then transferred into smaller trucks and vans to be taken further into
the country to towns as far away as Meru and Voi. While some can clearly
be identified, others that have been imported can easily mingle with
those that have been heavily taxed in Kenya, creating unfair competition
in the market and denying Kenya billions of shillings in unpaid tax.
KRA
is, however, not worried that the tax difference especially on beer is
working in favour of Uganda. The taxman insists its machineries are
sharp enough to enforce the high taxation with the yields from excise
tax, which is mainly levied on alcohol, having grown over time to Sh54.7
billion in the year to June 2019.
KRA
Commissioner for Domestic Taxes Elizabeth Meyo told Smart Company that
the taxman had received a boost from other government agencies to
enforce order control and tame the influx of cheaper products from
outside the country from being smuggled at the disadvantage of local
ones.
Robust border controls?
“When
Kenya sets its tax rates, it takes into consideration all factors
necessary for successful implementation of the law including enforcement
frameworks required to deter abuse of the law. To this end, KRA is
working with a multi-agency framework and has established comprehensive
border control in customs and an enforcement function within the
domestic market,” Ms Meyo said.
A
spot check on the border presents a completely different picture from
the robust border control as the KRA boss may want to portray it. In
fact, owners of bars have either been forced to close, open branches on
the other side of the border or simply smuggle the beer to sell at the
lower rate on the Kenyan side.
Last
month, a multi-agency team from the Kenya Revenue Authority,
Anti-Counterfeit Agency and Kenya Association of Manufacturers held a
one-day conference in the border town where the real challenges of
addressing the situation were laid bare.
The
authorities were finding it hard to dissuade consumers from buying
cheaper goods, with some of the enforcement officers confessing to being
consumers of the same drinks across the border.
Predictable raids
Traders
who are eyeing the margin were also not easy to convince to buy from
Kenya or import formally and be taxed heavily, a situation that has
created a thriving smuggling economy.
So
rampant is the smuggling that Busia County Commissioner Jacob Narengo
has dedicated a team comprising security officers who conduct a weekly
raid on pubs in the area that stock cheap alcohol from Uganda to tame
the illicit trade on the Kenyan side of the border. The raids have also
become too predictable and the smuggling cartels have standing armies in
some areas where no one can dare approach.
“In
some areas like Marachi, you cannot enforce anything and we have been
met with hostility before despite going there with four vehicles full of
police officers,” KRA Regional Surveillance officer Vincent Kimosop
told the illicit trade conference.
The
situation is even worsened by lack of harmony in quality standards
between the two countries. While Kenya banned the packaging of liquor in
sachets back in 2005, Uganda allowed the packaging until recently.
Liquor is also sold in any regular shop across the border, unlike in
Kenya where one requires several licences, including some from the
county governments, to run a pub.
The
liquor from Uganda now comes in plastic bottles, with some packaged in
as little as 205-millilitre containers and sold for as low as Sh50. KRA
is now proposing to set the Kenyan minimum prices for the spirits at
Sh150, a move that will play into the hands of the smuggling cartels,
unless there is watertight border monitoring.
The
setting of minimum prices, which goes against Kenya’s competition laws,
is expected to level the playing field for distilleries, according to
KRA, which believes one cannot manufacture and sell the 250ml bottles of
spirits unless they have evaded tax.
Although
KRA insists that its excise tax collection has been on the rise despite
the differentials in the tax rates within the East African Community,
Kenya could still collect more tax had there been a significant
reduction in the smuggling of beer, spirits and wine through the porous
borders.
The drinks spread as far as Nairobi and are popular in slums and rural areas.
Excise
tax, which also includes that on mobile cellular phone services, fees
charged for money transfers as well as cosmetics and soft drinks, rose
from Sh38.2 billion in 2014 to the Sh54.7 billion last year. The amount
is still lower compared with the Sh55.5 billion collected in 2016, which
dropped to Sh53 billion in 2017.
No comments:
Post a Comment